13/67aefa0a5f295e510c671e09669ac9581cb431

   1 Return-Path: <oliver.g.charles@googlemail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0D7431FBD\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2010 10:09:00 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.701, \r
  12         BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id 54+z-mZ1PtlC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Fri,  5 Feb 2010 10:09:00 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154])\r
  18         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C63431FAE\r
  19         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  5 Feb 2010 10:08:59 -0800 (PST)\r
  20 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so35008fga.2\r
  21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:08:59 -0800 (PST)\r
  22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
  23         d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;\r
  24         h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references\r
  25         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type\r
  26         :content-transfer-encoding;\r
  27         bh=S/77OLVu24y0fJ5GBQ817QbjZzXH6Qvz96e03Mj75IY=;\r
  28         b=ZFwujjDVR/ErRhAIN/84pKNTzAvUheZBPZ6FkmipR3W0X45GsQyIZTnhbf9patzWBR\r
  29         UYGXDsg+jWB0jHh1OK6QhFdzZqjqB1Ry09ke5bY0TJyHAmzZmLVs2W5fqvyTcAY7vFyP\r
  30         uxzzoXA2RQexmEv3/SWly5Xh5kk1P7+fggOXE=\r
  31 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;\r
  32         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
  33         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;\r
  34         b=xuTGofOjzipomeQUBq5dDQXDUFIXMa8Dqkzx+oa1UP7r4T9EZUnfMKl4QTOMzot0IG\r
  35         qpObhG4uatZ1vJWWIYuZ2oKIll7wQwCbHb2pG5tjpW/kaVVN1DCkvDtfgp7DM11Bi1Gq\r
  36         UHvbR5VJuNKqmQxR5NJW6kiDO5XprGbRUyQuk=\r
  37 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  38 Received: by 10.87.20.13 with SMTP id x13mr5341682fgi.67.1265393339008; Fri, \r
  39         05 Feb 2010 10:08:59 -0800 (PST)\r
  40 In-Reply-To: <87636bws2o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  41 References: <87636bws2o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  42 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:08:58 +0000\r
  43 Message-ID: <5641883d1002051008p5c2fabb2y9343e44882fc9238@mail.gmail.com>\r
  44 From: Oliver Charles <oliver.g.charles@googlemail.com>\r
  45 To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
  47 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  48 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  49 Subject: Re: [notmuch] strange behavior of indexing of and searching for\r
  50         strings containing '[]'\r
  51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  53 Precedence: list\r
  54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  63 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:09:00 -0000\r
  64 \r
  65 On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Jameson Rollins\r
  66 <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
  67 > Does anyone have any idea what's going on here? =A0I think I saw mention\r
  68 > of this issue on IRC somewhere, but I thought I should bring it up\r
  69 > explicitly here. =A0This is definitely some buggy behavior.\r
  70 \r
  71 Afaik, stuff in between [] is not indexed, but that doesn't quite\r
  72 explain the other weird results.\r
  73 \r
  74 --=20\r
  75     Oliver Charles / aCiD2\r