2 <return-fb4rmitufn96rjryaesyt9p6c2@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
\r
3 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
5 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
6 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435C66DE02C2
\r
7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
\r
8 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
10 X-Spam-Score: -2.054
\r
12 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.257,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
\r
15 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id vhWPvURGxGZI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (market.scs.stanford.edu [171.66.3.10])
\r
20 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE14F6DE00DF
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost.scs.stanford.edu
\r
23 [127.0.0.1]) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id
\r
24 u32DuDXE027197; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 Received: (from dm@localhost)
\r
26 by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u32DuDmB025809;
\r
27 Sat, 2 Apr 2016 06:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
\r
28 X-Authentication-Warning: market.scs.stanford.edu: dm set sender to
\r
29 return-fb4rmitufn96rjryaesyt9p6c2@ta.scs.stanford.edu using -f
\r
30 From: David Mazieres <dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu>
\r
31 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
32 Subject: Re: Breaking a really long thread
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <87a8lci3ob.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
34 References: <1459015043-8460-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
\r
35 <87twjkopb8.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <87a8lci3ob.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
36 Reply-To: David Mazieres expires 2016-07-01 PDT
\r
37 <mazieres-jrytcxj8r4ig46868y6cdjipr6@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
\r
38 Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:56:12 -0700
\r
39 Message-ID: <874mbkyv0j.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>
\r
41 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
\r
45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
46 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
52 List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
54 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 13:56:23 -0000
\r
56 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
\r
58 > David Mazieres <dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu> writes:
\r
60 >> Is there any way to break an existing thread (so as to start over with a
\r
61 >> smaller thread), or otherwise to tweak the threading rules so that a
\r
62 >> particular References header gets ignored.
\r
64 > Currently there is no way to do this, as threads are "stateless"
\r
65 > i.e. created on the fly by _notmuch_create_thread based only on
\r
66 > immutable mail data.
\r
70 >> It's annoyingly slow to open
\r
71 >> a thread with 10,000 messages just to read one SMS. I'm almost tempted
\r
72 >> to mangle the messages on delivery and remove the References header
\r
73 >> before notmuch sees them, but it would be nice to have a cleaner
\r
74 >> solution, as there are other situations in which one might want to
\r
75 >> "reset" a really long thread.
\r
77 > Like this thread ;).
\r
79 Oops, sorry for the irrelevant thread inclusion. I guess emacs adds the
\r
80 References header after a message is sent is sent? In my setup, the
\r
81 easiest way to post to a mailing list is to reply to an existing message
\r
82 (since I subscribe to each list under a different email address). I
\r
83 tried to start a new thread by deleting the In-Reply-To and header which
\r
84 was all I saw, but I guess the References header got inserted later...
\r