1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76AF431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 08:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id Ano5eE5Hwj8y for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 7 May 2014 08:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
19 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
20 44611431FAE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 08:09:02 -0700
\r
22 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l18so1119841wgh.11
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 07 May 2014 08:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
\r
27 :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=4ZvN5J5hCdXIBos0TWMyc61Ivviz9iv3QIPJhqQUgm8=;
\r
29 b=h3D813tUo+NiixTJBiuDp02YiuSZIjiOazaMEB0HWOi28Fe6iZgOS0027LDhiGwSGV
\r
30 TT1ghSZ4bldGixdivbDP+DsaIP6pCIQpehliCUL2bNtmefLz9TheVUhrq0q/VIIPzymR
\r
31 sEixiUbXKmmeU7VKF7K/fOsGryPMRhYWIaopfg4AzyzmrWwq14gH7RcOFbIXKW05gXGq
\r
32 8uICNtDk35iyzIGpDB+kXbWdXU9EUpYeTPUnW157AkBOu1X+CS5makOqyoF2OaS/UYmq
\r
33 ukzlc33IhvKQQ5+geFM08voirfztZRXbGdttLiHOUDLP4DxkzqgoBvmGQJ/Qc0HhERU2
\r
36 ALoCoQmwfHHLX41eEsHuIO78VTOA0Jy5n1wW2xOuNWiwl8PYfcX6jXL2+leUTfiqFEPaq502XPJj
\r
37 X-Received: by 10.194.189.116 with SMTP id gh20mr14395163wjc.41.1399475339799;
\r
38 Wed, 07 May 2014 08:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net. [81.149.164.25])
\r
40 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm32176598wix.5.2014.05.07.08.08.57
\r
41 for <multiple recipients>
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
43 Wed, 07 May 2014 08:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 Subject: Re: [Patch v3 0/3] emacs: show: redesign unread/read logic
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <1395777793-13297-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
47 References: <1395777793-13297-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
49 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
50 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
51 Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 16:08:52 +0100
\r
52 Message-ID: <cunwqdxfwxn.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
54 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
55 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
60 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 15:09:08 -0000
\r
71 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
72 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
74 On Tue, Mar 25 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
\r
75 > The third patch adds my attempt at a plausible logic. I find it works
\r
76 > very well: it usually does both what I expect and what I want.
\r
78 Whilst I think that the patch is well done, I don't like the resulting
\r
79 behaviour. That is a personal preference, of course. At the moment it
\r
80 doesn't seem that there is a way to accept this patch and (optionally)
\r
81 retain the existing behaviour. Do you have any thoughts on how we might
\r
84 I don't have a strong preference for the default behaviour, though I
\r
85 suspect that something closer to the current behaviour (where a message
\r
86 is marked seen when it becomes the current message[1]) would better
\r
87 match user expectation (but this is an opinion, not something founded in
\r
94 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
\r
96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
99 iKYEARECAGYFAlNqTIRfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
\r
100 bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDc1M0Y5NDJDMEExNjc3MDE4OURGMUYyMDY5
\r
101 RUNEMEFCRjA0OTY1MTYACgkQaezQq/BJZRZihACfbXV5MryOZfCtT4YK0tm532Ms
\r
102 Sk8AnieMRLxXVtfLOElCGqD5/D8byU+a
\r
104 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r