1 Return-Path: <xuwang762@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42576DE1B2E
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-0.377, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
\r
13 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,
\r
14 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
\r
15 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.644,
\r
16 URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled
\r
17 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
18 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
19 with ESMTP id 8m4wpxN10yDz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
20 Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com
\r
23 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DADC6DE1B2C
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so66829142obb.1
\r
26 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
27 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
28 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
\r
30 bh=l0lMVYsW5Fb9WxSpbCuAo3EUAIeIeIGK5faO7IQtE3I=;
\r
31 b=z6y/fjxoS45cXI6aLsfLqlZKepUapAYuvk7w+SgO4QcUbwLqPgWIm4z7NazbM2y0av
\r
32 amrJuIEVrHyOCqlNqZAkqUUr1no9Hp8oNQuhxmy+7Ka9LgQYC1SI2TPSb3Mc4H7Fu5eu
\r
33 75Kzpaw9Q7NMi9fKnrb9CAbGab9IjxWDHCye0e3D5NZqAXg4aXciADvAN8auNLwj+m7E
\r
34 7YF7wU4mVQwOm+4mIWekRJ6sxwkqbe/I/gphmbMa47txVP9YjaQ56pl0GgKcboYQY/dM
\r
35 8pApEU6VRMxtY1oWZbrkNon2dNk+ZzoykQDS6IMuPZEUnne3dIE30WRTKYT0GZ3nnpst
\r
38 X-Received: by 10.182.158.164 with SMTP id wv4mr9403505obb.78.1442759638163;
\r
39 Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 Received: by 10.202.212.204 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 In-Reply-To: <87fv2a4ctt.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
43 <CAJhTkNh7_hXDLsAGyD7nwkXV4ca6ymkLtFG945USvfqK4ZJEdQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
44 <87fv2a4ctt.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
45 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 10:33:58 -0400
\r
47 <CAJhTkNgBdnm18UXC95ryJk5w7fJpa7-1LvdugV3S29fL4kxxhQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
48 Subject: Re: Possible some threads are not complete due to bug?
\r
49 From: Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com>
\r
50 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
52 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:34:01 -0000
\r
67 On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:02 PM, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
68 > Xu Wang <xuwang762@gmail.com> writes:
\r
70 >> Sometimes I need to do:
\r
72 >> $ notmuch search --output=threads "id:MYMSGID"
\r
73 >> thread:000000000000a125
\r
74 >> $ notmuch search --output=messages "thread:000000000000a125"
\r
76 >> In theory, this should output the message that responded to message ID
\r
77 >> "MYMSGID". Sometimes it works. But sometimes it does not work. That
\r
78 >> is, there exists an email where I am sure (I checked the raw email)
\r
79 >> that there is a header
\r
80 >> In-Reply-To: <MYMSGID>
\r
81 >> but that email does not show when I do the two commands above.
\r
83 > I'm not 100% sure what you mean by "does not show". Do you mean that the
\r
84 > output from the second command is empty? or does not contain MYMSGID?
\r
86 That was poor formatting on my part. It only was outputting the id I
\r
87 put into the first command. So it only showed
\r
90 >> Indeed, that mail belongs to a different thread ID.
\r
92 > How can you tell that the mail belongs to a different thread?
\r
94 Because when I do a notmuch search for that message by message ID with
\r
95 --output=threads, it gives a different thread ID.
\r
97 > Isn't that what your first command tells you?
\r
98 Well yes, but I wanted to confirm that that is indeed the reason. I
\r
99 have heard in someone saying that debugging is process of confirming
\r
100 things that should be true.
\r