Re: Arg out of range error when tagging on the search view
[notmuch-archives.git] / 08 / 967a23638113ac3aa7a49578b374f18106486b
1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA96431FD0\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id 1XqlNjp7fda2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
18         [131.215.239.19])\r
19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F6D431FB6\r
20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
22         by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EB966E02FE;\r
23         Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
25 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com\r
26         [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
27         by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06AA66E04B5;\r
28         Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
29 Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
30         id 547471F5E; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
32 To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: "search-by-folder" single-word search terms should\r
34         be updated correctly when directories are renamed.\r
35 In-Reply-To: <8739kk9hpq.fsf@praet.org>\r
36 References: <87tyh9wzs2.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <878vyjya2n.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
37         <87vd1n4rd2.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
38         <877hc3x5td.fsf@A7GMS.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
39         <8739kk9hpq.fsf@praet.org>\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
41         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
42 Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:04:06 -0700\r
43 Message-ID: <87fwojhpmx.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
44 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
46         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
49 Precedence: list\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
51         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
53         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
58         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:04:17 -0000\r
60 \r
61 --=-=-=\r
62 \r
63 On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:22:25 +0200, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
64 > I've pushed a cleaner version of this patch to my github repo, for\r
65 > inclusion in release-candidate/0.6.\r
66 \r
67 Hey, Pieter.  I realize we've been passing around git urls a lot\r
68 recently, particularly in regards to the release-candidate/0.6 branch,\r
69 but I think we should try to retain the habit of sending all patches to\r
70 the list if we can.\r
71 \r
72 In general, I think we should try to only use git branches when:\r
73 \r
74 - compiling existing patch series for review.\r
75 - new patch series that are so long that sending them to the list would\r
76   be cumbersome.\r
77 \r
78 I've been bad about this myself, since I was pushing patches to the\r
79 r-c/0.6 branch, but I think in general we should try to avoid that.\r
80 It's nice to have all patches on the list, so everyone can easily review\r
81 them and publicly comment on them.\r
82 \r
83 Thanks!\r
84 \r
85 jamie.\r
86 \r
87 --=-=-=\r
88 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
89 \r
90 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
91 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
92 \r
93 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNzAT2AAoJEO00zqvie6q8+9MP/3TVPxwpeunQ0mzeN++g9QyY\r
94 Zu9co0KN+IHTM4kDluf5doQvsd21jSjHKj/i/miTBDPGOVTCmETjL5FFJ6ie+mz1\r
95 8s36S17Zb+Du+xp7AxK1rATKK/iurUImw3uk7/oGkCxfLShkIBIzc2eDFAX452T2\r
96 upjHj2/kPpDX4LSB/ybrjEOS0CW+ubkgnpqPptfQFaRuuR8dAiBDja9DLzzwm61A\r
97 wMYmzyscIVYOXI06kFxi/1f3CDe8oqfdUkrfvLkoFxskxhugginSeqRWDt7fw7MI\r
98 O0Gwe0D15R8pTxqovP8FpmsRQJobLZbv4JMfINQOZabERG6Mqx9kr3R+ZC8c1iJO\r
99 W61yrRPIS2iALcwsVOsretiJSrz5EG/p6srfwHMLzLCJp7kbNoDBPKk6cncVd38B\r
100 BRKEc/oN+RUb+LTVbDE13k7SjHitayEdoJ7BqzkpYS9WlHhzQ20/KygRv5E4vnNa\r
101 ykURI3avnSPuYoguapn7ipU2DbTGqyP95eVCBS7t4S6usHmm6zdPK98onoXTyLe/\r
102 Ma9tElXnLzrcjNZnsU+tuLDS/bpD6l5nTsDa08JtoamlVeiBzEzFhlluSLcHZhYI\r
103 PgCJ9MpVHlzjbvLbqSLgkex8ilJ2a/mvbxAVTvww1L+m1XJ9WrntF1xwovRirveQ\r
104 XP1Cu57RFLbbsC6YZ95Z\r
105 =RtTQ\r
106 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
107 --=-=-=--\r