1 Return-Path: <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D389431FD0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id iwhstJ-wRek4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com
\r
20 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FE8F431FB6
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so318545bwg.26
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
27 d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
\r
28 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
29 :message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
30 bh=T33Bx9ECyom4ItbI/JaVR7YUEzVTX/okBveotCDjBSY=;
\r
31 b=lHJUvB3w7riQiOhTTw8i+b0FTCd7D00Sjd++4ye44xT9QVnU+fxFWHbzwBNSfflcQ0
\r
32 0GJSyW8mB15OlLXBOMVoSm1jGcU716ZHKfwQWoQVVQucEg0xg0k9CYvutvKmQfrjeITj
\r
33 5wL6KbHGnS9fJsikTYn1/isV0GWKEZhGiEGzU=
\r
34 Received: by 10.204.10.75 with SMTP id o11mr5436440bko.124.1309978017759;
\r
35 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
36 Received: from localhost (dslb-088-069-135-087.pools.arcor-ip.net
\r
38 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o27sm2207494fag.0.2011.07.06.11.46.55
\r
39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
40 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 From: Daniel Schoepe <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>
\r
42 To: Sander Boer <sanderboer@mauc.nl>, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@sspaeth.de>
\r
43 Subject: Re: notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57
\r
45 <CACEMMeewjcM1Vo=uq_wrhe_5Z+OESsJD_29-D7z5JxT6Mvq7qA@mail.gmail.com>
\r
46 References: <mailman.5.1309146869.12973.notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 <cuozkl367o2.fsf@mauc.nl> <87wrg5905c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
48 <87wrg3pyra.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
49 <CACEMMeewjcM1Vo=uq_wrhe_5Z+OESsJD_29-D7z5JxT6Mvq7qA@mail.gmail.com>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-321-g7d7ebd8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
52 Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:46:48 +0200
\r
53 Message-ID: <87fwmjqmav.fsf@tredergarh.home.box>
\r
55 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
56 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
57 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:47:00 -0000
\r
74 On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 20:31:03 +0200, Sander Boer <sanderboer@mauc.nl> wrote:
\r
75 > If IMAP supports tags, is that not a big deal ?
\r
76 > I mean, having a converging point for all tags, is that not like the holy
\r
77 > grail in this field ?
\r
79 One problem is that maildir doesn't support tags, so we would have to
\r
80 switch to a format that does or somehow store them in the maildir, in
\r
81 which case we would also have to adapt offlineimap or a similar tool to
\r
84 > Do you know what the status is of *server* support ? Because imo this *is* a
\r
85 > big deal, without real standardized server support an IMAP store for tags is
\r
88 Support for tags is mentioned in the RFC for IMAP, but it's optional. As
\r
89 far as I know, must servers today support them though.
\r
94 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
97 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
99 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOFK2ZAAoJEIaTAtce+Z+J4eQP+gPwo/1CBYzvhDyCMJOGayN7
\r
100 Ew/s8u6owOlh2l+UMuzlCMNrWmZZ0+3wkGzBf5T7PyvQyoETpc6Ee6/dta9F4nCO
\r
101 hG6POW+ZWC+hG7t3BWmQ2T6NX6Y011FfToHyQH3ps2OYby2Gg60UqpAwtmA8QskE
\r
102 xNMc86Gd3S8YMiOa7QZjOXGUl1VlDVOyaMo/YKXNbah7G3dAen2200DbUB9+ekFg
\r
103 vzqTkh7JVKS5H7k3k2tjYbrGNOwsUSPCRJ77OfTyyxw9d423f/vVJSVTzTjAq+zh
\r
104 n/KQ+2uTh9GBtnaHBX2RSqDUISj0eLgqUXiFITItpIVSGs5DHXmMbvFVOgvCXLYS
\r
105 mmX8tyB68+QHBTzJExOZS6HoLK0poh2AdXYUVz8UANQgr7etSSpkU2/5iqxHKHum
\r
106 OeXaJKChgB+mO5BTtC6EIgq7Wk7fneKJu/TyCN0WtWWyIRh8aaMHK8T3HeIxQd2h
\r
107 cbE2Vf5A1vSqvdr5jrGzAlNykuy5Spq69wt8kjk2O0Ag0jI/whtvoreg+SBph/3F
\r
108 M96TLMCFO9LG/865pWH72q8JKYZXJ+l7WAWbur+3kHTYnmWSSTD2f31rGeGpziCG
\r
109 D0eNCo6jahDx/xLgMcX+COX0xVi22sEjOGOHrV+kFxbAulM6P5UoMAAd/ANuKYeR
\r
110 T2hNmVbz1TrY7g1SHkru
\r
112 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r