1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3544429E55
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id WDCGvsY9pBKq for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com
\r
20 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA540429E2A
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so558218bwg.26
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
27 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
28 :message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
29 bh=KW41kSeVDz2lQ7CJV/UiPlA5qCarzPcBfltXOYW5u5Y=;
\r
30 b=qPrPAxTbGm08DicP2w6odAhKRkcE1gBkDBscTSvZhlp+vRqr0ZxAK6MA0bMyYGNCXo
\r
31 rd/3iDZckr5OH5A6PTVWZfWi2fkQrK1cXNTUxLlPX5Uo2KwAtHdV9Bco1bhOtROF0vaZ
\r
32 7L2EX8D1Xlq6Q8TMQg5zrkiLovH490110Cekc=
\r
33 Received: by 10.204.233.15 with SMTP id jw15mr19789bkb.48.1309294727237;
\r
34 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
35 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
\r
36 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g13sm526370bkd.10.2011.06.28.13.58.45
\r
37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
38 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
40 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
41 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: use emacsclient(1) for Emacs tests
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <87zkl190od.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
43 References: <1309132379-24089-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
44 <1309146846-30991-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
45 <1309146846-30991-2-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
46 <BANLkTi=nwHRndz367K5oh4=tPaU-KNeZ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
\r
47 <87hb7byqge.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3hyzs1c.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
48 <20110628034937.GB4120@mit.edu> <20110628162257.GD4120@mit.edu>
\r
49 <871uydzz3x.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkl190od.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-275-g75c95e5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
51 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
52 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:58:41 +0400
\r
53 Message-ID: <87k4c5y8ou.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
61 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:58:49 -0000
\r
71 On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:10:58 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
72 Non-text part: multipart/signed
\r
73 > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:42:42 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
74 > > I would like to hear what other (Carl in particular) think about this.
\r
75 > > If the consensus is for your approach, I would be happy to implement
\r
78 > In general, I love the whole series, thanks! I'm looking forward to our
\r
79 > future, faster test suite.
\r
82 BTW Carl, while we continue our debate, you may consider applying the
\r
83 first 9 patches from the series :)
\r
85 id:"1309236311-2162-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com"
\r
90 > Even more, I love the constructive dialog that follows the original
\r
91 > series and the attention being focused on getting things right.
\r
93 > As for the detail of whether to use emacsclient or Austin's look-alike,
\r
94 > I don't have a strong attachment to either solution. I do appreciate
\r
95 > concrete technical things like "robust against recycled PIDs", "more
\r
96 > robust against leaving daemon's around for some reason", etc.
\r
98 > Would any of this potentially interfere with my own usage of emacsclient
\r
99 > and emacs server? I use them regularly and would be quite surprised (and
\r
100 > likely frustrated) if the test suite got mixed up with my existing emacs
\r
101 > server (or the other way around). Maybe that's already taken care of
\r
102 > with either approach? (A quick skim of the emacsclient manual age didn't
\r
103 > make it obvious to me how emacslcient finds its server.)
\r
108 > carl.d.worth@intel.com
\r
109 Non-text part: application/pgp-signature
\r