Re: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN

diff --git a/f7/2fac0be632ea902eb03279d3d0393fe1eb352c b/f7/2fac0be632ea902eb03279d3d0393fe1eb352c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..7199f1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f7/2fac0be632ea902eb03279d3d0393fe1eb352c
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A859431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:39:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ox-jRExmbAy4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:39:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F263B431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:39:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8C066E0134;\r
+       Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:39:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (pool-108-27-62-184.nycmny.fios.verizon.net\r
+       [108.27.62.184]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6ED66E012B;\r
+       Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:39:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 04E994B1; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:39:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN\r
+In-Reply-To: <4F708A2D.90800@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+References: <87d3814qkv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <CAMoJFUuGS_y4Sqtug5Ohdic3M43_fexWOt7cAw-ebuZ_SVUnjQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <8762drl766.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <4F708A2D.90800@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+335~gf868783 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:39:24 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87zkb3jrrn.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:39:32 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:24:29 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.=\r
+net> wrote:\r
+> On 03/26/2012 11:21 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:\r
+> > Does it make sense for the cli to canonicalize the content types to\r
+> > always be lower case?  Or should it continue to just pass the content\r
+> > type exactly as it appears in the original message?  Given that\r
+> > consumers should parse it case insensitively, it maybe doesn't matter,\r
+> > but it might also be nice for us to be consistent.\r
+>=20\r
+> i think "notmuch emits the content-type in the exact form contained in\r
+> the underlying message" is a good flavor of consistency.\r
+\r
+Works for me.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPcI2sAAoJEO00zqvie6q83hUP/RVCpzf86mgZxoksmgRnsmHK\r
+4N1KZj9feZRXXfxJBWrGAzdd6me/qoZmEk5Ffj37dlnY3ub7xrugjVLhoBpt+Zug\r
+/mdJqlx2z7GB468tiiqI3WP8bvk9cntQ3COw2u8VSNoiUMtucbGlF2nnI+YifN1S\r
+fXEuQGO/1fpvueS6/kMylZsd77hGQ9cBGA1M+QNEbLOYO5lk1N8KmxOsYY01ozvh\r
+th3eBtsRkZ3Gl2UF2LHdnY/K0eHx0jYFMeFEhH2YdG5OvuQXCcqL9WOEL23Izn+O\r
+D0eji3FpnyO9mPGSCoEcW7IazLebGS8OPUriyuX1WRiind+k3+ZjeLNybtqZrhSf\r
+Owf5Feem9N7SCV4MGlD2Xy8Ruj5OC1Z8XYMEZJa2Xd//AJoie99x/aFrX2Xxvviy\r
+ul0oqG8HjX80i3SuURmH2YqydAUZsBuQAUfCjliT9Gef//fszukYN7MfqF5EIbR/\r
+EsRhH2PGguKDKHDxcrqTh9kkUkFKO11qb0tMkNc/agKBPAO8jYNuRTYWQ9bfzLqy\r
+n3yKssOadJI6yvUbd17vLj3WQQdhJVAf23B2wgHBjbmaZhpffrzuKorl4vSTH3oH\r
+3ndfU5YTalNM2khialNLKeJII5FF71bJ1rHu5FSFOi9DwO88RONXWV/hNRDDgtFv\r
+iJn6+Ml2v5Ic7pQafA1e\r
+=+KeM\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r