Re: [PATCH 0/5] Store message modification times in the DB

diff --git a/47/fe3bb86194a961af9c6bf223d7838f5f470ecf b/47/fe3bb86194a961af9c6bf223d7838f5f470ecf
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2541706
--- /dev/null
+++ b/47/fe3bb86194a961af9c6bf223d7838f5f470ecf
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2E9429E25\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:34:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id D7AFgtDI0fh5 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:34:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 86D33431FB6   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:34:53 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbds13 with SMTP id ds13so8948576wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:34:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.227.208.129 with SMTP id gc1mr15663000wbb.4.1324312492274;\r
+       Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:34:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net\r
+       (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id er5sm26302087wbb.11.2011.12.19.08.34.50\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:34:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)\r
+       id 09459A032E; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:34:49 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Store message modification times in the DB\r
+In-Reply-To: <1323796305-28789-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net>\r
+References: <1323796305-28789-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+107~ga2d0215 (http://notmuchmail.org)\r
+       Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Now-Playing: David Gray: Smile (Sell, Sell, Sell)\r
+Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:34:49 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <cunk45szfiu.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:34:54 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:11:40 +0100, Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net> wrote:\r
+> This is a patch series I've been working on for some time in order to be\r
+> able to sync my tags on several computers. I'm posting it now, but\r
+> please consider it as a RFC rather than something that is ready to be\r
+> pushed.\r
+> \r
+> The basic idea is to the last time each message was modified, i.e. "the\r
+> message was added to the DB", "a tag was added" or "a tag was removed".\r
+\r
+Thomas, this is interesting. Do you have a (back of the envelope?)\r
+design for how you will use this information to implement tag sync?\r
+\r
+My gut feeling is that we need a log of when a change occurred rather\r
+than the last modification time, but I haven't really thought that all\r
+through properly.\r
+\r
+dme.\r
+-- \r
+David Edmondson, http://dme.org\r