Re: [PATCH 0/5] Notmuch Pick (WIP or contrib)

diff --git a/29/542f690a945bc7b67cd5e09bb17d1bfca58277 b/29/542f690a945bc7b67cd5e09bb17d1bfca58277
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5c32a06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/29/542f690a945bc7b67cd5e09bb17d1bfca58277
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F99431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:13:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 5HEovb+lYs8T for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:13:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A43F1431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:13:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1TILCc-00058u-Fq; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:13:06 +0100\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1TILCc-0007Ow-5Y; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:13:06 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Notmuch Pick (WIP or contrib)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87r4prcvon.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <1343164911-31589-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+       <87r4prcvon.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+30~g1894b09 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:13:08 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87wqzbmtmj.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 9e3c4bb0f03639c3a885b8a8cff15059 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:13:15 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+>> The code is not of the same standard as mainline code: in particular a\r
+>> lot of the code is written by me and is working but unidiomatic\r
+>> lisp. It has also not had widespread testing so I would expect it to\r
+>> have several bugs.\r
+>\r
+> I have gotten the following traceback when running in emacs 24.2.1 if\r
+> the pick buffer is the sole window.  It might be related somehow to\r
+> running emacsclient.\r
+>\r
+> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Attempt to delete minibuffer or sole ordinary window")\r
+>   signal(error ("Attempt to delete minibuffer or sole ordinary window"))\r
+>   error("Attempt to delete minibuffer or sole ordinary window")\r
+>   byte-code(" ")\r
+>   delete-window(#<window 327 on *notmuch-pick-thread:00000000000270ce*<2>>)\r
+>   notmuch-pick-close-message-window()\r
+>   notmuch-pick-quit()\r
+>   call-interactively(notmuch-pick-quit nil nil)\r
+\r
+Thanks for this (and sorry to be slow responding): I can reproduce this\r
+error without emacsclient. I have a "fix" which I think is ok but I\r
+want to try a bit more testing before posting anything.\r
+\r
+Thanks\r
+\r
+Mark\r