Re: notmuch search and tags

diff --git a/2b/b7973941903d2b12bebccccea5930a483675a6 b/2b/b7973941903d2b12bebccccea5930a483675a6
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..17c7426
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2b/b7973941903d2b12bebccccea5930a483675a6
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A5C431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 00:43:29 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id CtA-Z-NAKJrB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  5 Nov 2012 00:43:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6F2E431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 00:43:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1TVIHB-0002OV-3x; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:43:23 +0000\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1TVIHA-0002YF-Ri; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:43:20 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,\r
+       notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch search and tags\r
+In-Reply-To: <874nl4fq7h.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\r
+References: <874nl4fq7h.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+94~gd1761fe (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:43:25 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87wqy0fniq.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: e02016c79f9ee694e1efb5e5c4f6a5d0 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:43:29 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+Do you have some customisation of the notmuch search line\r
+(notmuch-search-result-format) in your .emacs file?\r
+\r
+Previously the user specified format for tags was ignored (and\r
+automatically enclosed the tags in brackets). Over the summer Austin\r
+fixed this and many other bugs (with the move to json for the search results).\r
+\r
+If you do have a customised search line then just replacing the ("tags"\r
+. "%s) by ("tag" . "(%s)") should fix it.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+On Mon, 05 Nov 2012, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:\r
+> We have the mails appearing as below now. Earlier the tags towards the\r
+> end used be enclosed in "(" ")"\r
+>\r
+> [21/21]   Today 10:57    Blake Jones, Jani Nikula, Tomi Ollila    [PATCH 05/10] install: check for non-SysV version (Solaris support) notmuch unread\r
+> [5/5]     Today 09:58    Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen, David Bremner, Jani Nikula, Austin Clements             Automatic suppression of non-duplicate messagesnotmuch unread\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> -aneesh\r
+>\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r