--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699EE431FD0\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:52:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id Xg+5tWwRqG9N for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:52:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (e3.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.143])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83FFC431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:52:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237])\r
+ by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p66HSuhl002149\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:28:56 -0400\r
+Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64])\r
+ by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id\r
+ p66Hq4wr147644\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:52:04 -0400\r
+Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id\r
+ p66Hq2HG015000\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:52:03 -0400\r
+Received: from skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com ([9.77.120.75])\r
+ by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id\r
+ p66Hpvji014355; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:51:59 -0400\r
+From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+ Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: priorities for 0.7\r
+In-Reply-To: <877h7vgxi3.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <877h7vgxi3.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-215-g5143e5e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+ (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:21:57 +0530\r
+Message-ID: <87iprfz48y.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:52:06 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:55:00 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+Non-text part: multipart/mixed\r
+Non-text part: multipart/signed\r
+> Hey, folks. Now that 0.6 is *finally* out the door, it's time to start\r
+> working on 0.7. As Interim Distinguished co-Chief Vice Tyrant I have\r
+> been tasked with starting the discussion on 0.7 release priorities.\r
+> \r
+> Below is just the beginning of list of things that have been discussed\r
+> on the list that we should consider merging or working on for 0.7. It's\r
+> weighted towards stuff that I've worked on only because I'm more\r
+> familiar with the state of those patches. Please send follow-ups to\r
+> this list to elaborate on certain things, or bring up other patches that\r
+> should be considered [0]. We can then push on Carl to merge these ahead\r
+> of the 0.7 freeze.\r
+> \r
+> - notmuch-new atomicity:\r
+> \r
+> id:"1307822683-848-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu"\r
+> \r
+> I believe that the above is that latest version of this series; Austin\r
+> can point us to the right one if it's not. This is an important\r
+> series that is long overdue to be merged. It should definitely be a\r
+> top priority.\r
+> \r
+> - message/rfc822 part support:\r
+> \r
+> id:"1307120466-4980-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"\r
+> id:"1307320169-29905-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"\r
+> \r
+> rfc822 part handling is a bit broken now after the notmuch-show\r
+> rework. The above patch series should have been included in 0.6 to\r
+> fix a couple of regressions. In the meantime Austin and I have\r
+> started looking at further rework of notmuch-show to try to clean it\r
+> up even more. This rework might supersedes these patches, but it\r
+> depends on how far we get.\r
+> \r
+> - emacs: Add notmuch-show-refresh-view function\r
+> \r
+> id:"1306627784-3401-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"\r
+> \r
+> - emacs: Add callback functions to crypto sigstatus button.\r
+> \r
+> id:"1306861633-3873-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"\r
+> \r
+> - emacs: notmuch-hello improvements (Daniel Schoepe, Michal Sojka,\r
+> Dmitry Kurochkin, Pieter Praet)\r
+> \r
+> These guys have been working on various improvements to the\r
+> notmuch-hello page. I'll let them comment on where they're at with\r
+> that, and what should be merged.\r
+> \r
+> - emacs: tagging race conditions (Austin Clements, Pieter Praet)\r
+> \r
+> Austin and Pieter have been looking at home to eliminate some race\r
+> conditions when tagging from the emacs interface. I'll let them\r
+> comment on where that's at.\r
+> \r
+> - emacs: default key bindings\r
+> \r
+> There's been a lot of discussion about default key bindings for the\r
+> emacs UI. This issue frankly terrifies me since I worry that it is\r
+> basically impossible to converge on anything. I think we'll need to\r
+> see a specific full proposal before we can really consider what to do\r
+> here.\r
+> \r
+> - I know there are other old patches that are sinking in to the abyss.\r
+> Hopefully any of those that are still relevant can be excavated.\r
+\r
+\r
+Don't overload same-window-regex\r
+\r
+id:"1288200417-6584-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com"\r
+\r
+Add reply-to header\r
+id:"1288200417-6584-2-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com"\r
+I guess we want a generic form for this. I guess we want enable the\r
+user to select what fields in the mail-header they would like to index\r
+\r
+-aneesh\r