unexpected behavior for search
authorBhaskara Marthi <bhaskara@gmail.com>
Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:37:05 +0000 (22:37 +1600)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:44:21 +0000 (09:44 -0800)
da/672cbb4185274cd2efd5f01dd013dde05dde36 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/da/672cbb4185274cd2efd5f01dd013dde05dde36 b/da/672cbb4185274cd2efd5f01dd013dde05dde36
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..7f0552a
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+Return-Path: <bhaskara@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD14431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.798\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 3MOVVjt2zWpi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11358431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:06 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by dady25 with SMTP id y25so3407151dad.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;\r
+       bh=KlJYT0c8nvNkbJHXTvghHGF4h+0MV8N+OH5+h8rPaRQ=;\r
+       b=wbXW2pS3ACr8ednhiXpu2+9bk6yfxIVXivMZwkt2UGHQH0FzAiA3pqO9BchvEswBLh\r
+       TUvXJzgTJ8sca1qDr+NsL2EVmldkfLiTsOqN5GWGk4twF9lJVggl9HMhYf+2P5bayZhq\r
+       RLzB/KzqY5ze50bjFyJx1Qt2RPMcaPS5gjb74=\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.68.219.234 with SMTP id pr10mr24292520pbc.11.1328942225169;\r
+       Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.68.0.138 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:37:05 -0800\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CADEZsr4WZhH2XiQxj6vdjLQJ4LELFAt9HfsR4rZPHjH8tE8vrw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: unexpected behavior for search\r
+From: Bhaskara Marthi <bhaskara@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff249c3421bc004b8aa7909\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:37:08 -0000\r
+\r
+--e89a8ff249c3421bc004b8aa7909\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+Either I have the search syntax wrong or there's a bug somewhere.  Is this\r
+not how to combine multiple tags?  The output of the first invocation shows\r
+that there exist threads tagged both inbox and unread, but the second\r
+invocation does not find them.\r
+- Bhaskara\r
+\r
+$ notmuch search $(date +%s -d 2012-02-09)..$(date +%s) tag:inbox | grep\r
+unread\r
+thread:000000000000ff28  Today 12:41 [3/4] Mac Mason, Bhaskara Marthi; I'm\r
+getting a build failure (inbox unread)\r
+thread:000000000000ec68  Yest. 09:32 [1/6] Gon=E7alo Cabrita| Ken Conley;\r
+[ros-users] serial_communication release (inbox unread)\r
+$ notmuch search tag:inbox and tag:unread\r
+$\r
+\r
+--e89a8ff249c3421bc004b8aa7909\r
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+Either I have the search syntax wrong or there&#39;s a bug somewhere.=A0 Is=\r
+ this not how to combine multiple tags?=A0 The output of the first invocati=\r
+on shows that there exist threads tagged both inbox and unread, but the sec=\r
+ond invocation does not find them.<br>\r
+- Bhaskara<br><br>$ notmuch search $(date +%s -d 2012-02-09)..$(date +%s) t=\r
+ag:inbox | grep unread<br>thread:000000000000ff28=A0 Today 12:41 [3/4] Mac =\r
+Mason, Bhaskara Marthi; I&#39;m getting a build failure (inbox unread)<br>\r
+thread:000000000000ec68=A0 Yest. 09:32 [1/6] Gon=E7alo Cabrita| Ken Conley;=\r
+ [ros-users] serial_communication release (inbox unread)<br>$ notmuch searc=\r
+h tag:inbox and tag:unread<br>$ <br><br>\r
+\r
+--e89a8ff249c3421bc004b8aa7909--\r