Re: Emacs UI improvement suggestion

diff --git a/02/fb2d58683b642ae17240cceb0890ca4b1122f1 b/02/fb2d58683b642ae17240cceb0890ca4b1122f1
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..970721b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/02/fb2d58683b642ae17240cceb0890ca4b1122f1
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E48C4196F2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  5 Nov 2010 04:23:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -4.19\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id YNk4hgV3AHNf for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  5 Nov 2010 04:23:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FCF4196F0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  5 Nov 2010 04:23:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-74-66-82-137.nyc.res.rr.com\r
+       [74.66.82.137])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oA5BNJ45017851\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:23:19 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1PEKO7-00020Z-TT; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:23:19 -0400\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,\r
+       Notmuch developer list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Emacs UI improvement suggestion\r
+In-Reply-To: <87pqukxlgo.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+References: <87pqukxlgo.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:23:14 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87mxpovwt9.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:23:32 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:45:27 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>=\r
+ wrote:\r
+> One UI improvement I would love is to see the number of unread=20\r
+> emails in a thread in notmuch-show view. I often reply to a=20\r
+> mail in a thread just to see that there are followup mails that=20\r
+> resolve the issue already.\r
+>=20\r
+> If I had seen that there are more unread mails in that thread=20\r
+> (or at least that branch of the thread), I would read those first=20\r
+> before hitting reply.\r
+>=20\r
+> What do others think?\r
+\r
+Hey, Sebastian.  Try looking at notmuch-search-line-faces (not very well\r
+named, my fault) which sets the face of search lines based on tags.\r
+I've been using the following setting:\r
+\r
+(setq notmuch-search-line-faces\r
+      '(("delete" . '(:background "grey8"))\r
+       ("unread" . '(:weight bold))))\r
+\r
+Threads with unread messages show up in bold, which makes them pretty\r
+easy to identify.  I also bind a key to filter\r
+\r
+"tag:unread and not tag:delete"\r
+\r
+which allows me to easily pop view the unread messages.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJM0+kjAAoJEO00zqvie6q8mfgP/iPbzRS0m36vhOuntHIg7eRB\r
+m1TzqmyPu+irtQQirG4R6XNKO5O/wjU7/FMiLywCY6s/iJsDvYsBMy5X7F0gMos8\r
+yx79LgXAlvN4SK/kQ8W7f76l+g8XnlSJt/yIJATs6PtYWKq3HnNLEJuaFL7gLfC/\r
+8Rhss0eZTMhHnpIhtdAw+MzVYCQOajHjHolLhLxuOhzdmKwsyaCKUG3vww4yFVqz\r
+izXD9WmEViCH5TIYlQ30JzEw979MXx6vmnk659ItTOYanLodYtE2YmBBV8SoRVSS\r
+qWArDbRbVasXMoa636gq7YNue2+KqA3CeryPav7ArTyw29/ZwK7gEcAqmuxEMjoZ\r
+ky8BahOG2F/Hr6zW8pbDbRIKoe7n20Y6yywXf+uaAin4ZaYhCSuvWUYYvTBNgP4j\r
+qGbZM7JCBduwdaQaRmsqQHvkkTiuld4ox/JeGj+Gv+4mBsfAX0kL3llrBo5HUkRK\r
+79xgE6bJba2LhH2ANSF3I18b6ol6KCF0NNnoDSvnWvNjDlEzS3AxGeifCy9qLh58\r
+Kjc1hUmQUY1CB1UXSq0Qw/DZsUgJaz3xXOVYV/BP0VgQXTiNY6WDrHoeomc+BdEc\r
+sPVIYdTiF7CUU8hhSs/5FQKVYEoe+eCRNyCzUoDS+EG4niDuMP0aVRgh0zqaVIwO\r
+Yog7nAiX6dM1MjTV0nWZ\r
+=4OQ5\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r