Re: S/MIME support in notmuch

diff --git a/2e/d020f5149b846f0b9f850ac1c4ce9efc64b06f b/2e/d020f5149b846f0b9f850ac1c4ce9efc64b06f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..856e096
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2e/d020f5149b846f0b9f850ac1c4ce9efc64b06f
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+Return-Path: <darren@fernseed.info>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9E0429E28\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:51:21 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.11\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id zSMz2-A+3HFV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:51:21 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from silentio.fernseed.info (silentio.fernseed.info [217.169.4.202])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F98431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:51:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (unknown [217.169.4.206])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: darren)\r
+       by silentio.fernseed.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6012DB4;\r
+       Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:15 +0000 (GMT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fernseed.info;\r
+       s=default; t=1324468275;\r
+       bh=S66u0r90D0ZmhavySs6C2Pc3K1L0HkwOBVOpUipiUzg=;\r
+       h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:\r
+       MIME-Version:Content-Type;\r
+       b=KhQyyDZNd1ygUAXd6rP/2VTyVnzBX3exi+5GOErV8irOmazPEwYhml27I2keftAo9\r
+       1Ret1FAZAKcM0pl0LW/PneLRg+RguOSsHs4olwtyLVmszUJxFDXZZ7m+l2rbEXTZ52\r
+       RMNpkpJDUGAo+yEFmfH/qJidnZ5e/yaQD8KGmbvk=\r
+From: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>\r
+To: Dan Bryant <dan.bryant@jhuapl.edu>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: S/MIME support in notmuch\r
+In-Reply-To: <87iplrwz0k.fsf@bryandb1-ll1.dom1.jhuapl.edu>\r
+References: <87iplrwz0k.fsf@bryandb1-ll1.dom1.jhuapl.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i386-redhat-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:01 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87aa6m6t3u.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:21 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:58:03 -0500, Dan Bryant <dan.bryant@jhuapl.edu> wrote:\r
+> I'd like to report some success on getting S/MIME signature\r
+> verification working using notmuch and the recently-released GMime\r
+> 2.6. I specifically tested with notmuch-0.10.2 and gmime-2.6.1.\r
+\r
+[...]\r
+\r
+> I don't have submittable patches for #2/#3 yet, but I wanted to share\r
+> what I found about the scope of what actually needs to be done, which\r
+> is fairly small. (The biggest blocker is probably that Debian & other\r
+> distros haven't packaged gmime-2.6.)\r
+\r
+Hi Dan, nice find!  As another Fedora user I'd be happy to test out any\r
+patches you come up with.\r
+\r
+When you make those changes to the gpg_context are you breaking gpg\r
+signature validation?  Or is the one a superset of the other?\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk7xyCYACgkQP1ao/7snsT6o+ACdEqowJ1Uec7mD4MPBwaQ+cHLz\r
+KsAAmQGiMWKasLjMsi4WNSCB32HFQUFp\r
+=+xVr\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r