Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot
authorBrian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:28:10 +0000 (11:28 +1000)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:38:53 +0000 (09:38 -0800)
d3/2fb7307e3e01c4d203f8d6a7e782b7b451078b [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/d3/2fb7307e3e01c4d203f8d6a7e782b7b451078b b/d3/2fb7307e3e01c4d203f8d6a7e782b7b451078b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ceb22cc
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Return-Path: <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BE3421192\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.8\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id d667rZ-DWDNL for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F32E42118E\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so2586495bwg.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=microcomaustralia.com.au; s=google;\r
+       h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+       :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;\r
+       bh=iv7xgFWI4wQ0s9E8CmF7Ub9GMoryPOe9C1anrPEZFTI=;\r
+       b=RpwHOzNBCyjDJIxT+itMRFan9x/UBCJaANz+JlmAVpjx8TrkLMrfThn+K71j2gCEB7\r
+       WjM11dqmm+jCJluYsE4xmGSc7JeYkaCKgjiTPYzrSUloaaAB1HtAkEkS5A+sDGEVN140\r
+       J/tkibDMxaT8k7VyZuBb+5eMYK4rGcT4JFvJI=\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.204.3.21 with SMTP id 21mr2542536bkl.6.1309483690630; Thu, 30\r
+       Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.204.72.139 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [202.158.218.252]\r
+In-Reply-To: <874o377o70.fsf@praet.org>\r
+References:\r
+ <CAH-f9Ws8oNb_UzzPNGsw0V29Rh0VTK2Tz0voG0QwLPcKTq1fCw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <874o377o70.fsf@praet.org>\r
+Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:28:10 +1000\r
+Message-ID: <BANLkTikRVTwC-OTkmubq4xTq3BBgpOn=0Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot\r
+From: Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>\r
+To: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 01:28:14 -0000\r
+\r
+On 30 June 2011 17:50, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> And AFAIK, "Archive" does *not* mark a message as read in GMail.\r
+> (see previous messages suggesting the inverse)\r
+\r
+gmail will mark all messages in the thread as read when looking at any\r
+part of the thread - so in practical terms whenever I click "Archive"\r
+the entire thread is marked as read - as I always click archive in the\r
+message view.\r
+\r
+Not absolutely convinced this is the best approach. I think it is\r
+important to appreciate the differences that different implementations\r
+have chosen.\r
+-- \r
+Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>\r