Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

diff --git a/02/40e7b143789141ff5bae5e47fb189e838dac54 b/02/40e7b143789141ff5bae5e47fb189e838dac54
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b1f4bf1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/02/40e7b143789141ff5bae5e47fb189e838dac54
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1194196F2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Apr 2010 08:21:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.9\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id QEs0Q7QZqRBd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu,  8 Apr 2010 08:21:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F045431FC1\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Apr 2010 08:21:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])\r
+       by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D668C19F33AE;\r
+       Thu,  8 Apr 2010 17:21:14 +0200 (CEST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])\r
+       by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,\r
+       port 10044)\r
+       with ESMTP id yuawRlXc+e38; Thu,  8 Apr 2010 17:21:11 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])\r
+       by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D9319F3409;\r
+       Thu,  8 Apr 2010 17:21:10 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)\r
+       by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76B2B15C062;\r
+       Thu,  8 Apr 2010 17:21:10 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)\r
+       id 1NztXa-0007vT-6w; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:21:10 +0200\r
+From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+To: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>,\r
+       Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)\r
+In-Reply-To: <m3tyrmgfdk.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>\r
+References: <8739z6rjxf.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87tyrmavoc.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <m3tyrmgfdk.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>\r
+Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:21:10 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <8763426kd5.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:21:16 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 08 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote:\r
+> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:03:15 -0400, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> > > For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to\r
+> > > have in place:\r
+> > > \r
+> > >   * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This\r
+> > >     is stuff that I'll work on.\r
+> > \r
+> > Also, fwiw, the folder: indexing is probably the new feature that I'm\r
+> > most eagerly awaiting.  I've got all these ideas for ways to handle sent\r
+> > mail and drafts if we can get this working.\r
+> \r
+> Maybe I am missing some context here - what exactly does 'indexing' mean\r
+> here?\r
+\r
+Indexing means calling notmuch new. The folder: patch, adds "folder:"\r
+search prefix which allows searching for messages based on the folder\r
+where the message is stored e.g. folder:sent.\r
+\r
+-Michal\r