Re: [notmuch] Git feature branch

diff --git a/3a/01ac150c060445943a433e0fd9c3bb1fc24b53 b/3a/01ac150c060445943a433e0fd9c3bb1fc24b53
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..65461eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3a/01ac150c060445943a433e0fd9c3bb1fc24b53
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+Return-Path: <micah@riseup.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CE4431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:00:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.056\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.942,\r
+       BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]  autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id iReTEEKcC-ui for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:00:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [204.13.164.18])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C44431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:00:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: micah@mx1.riseup.net)\r
+       with ESMTPSA id D3AA625F687\r
+Received: by lillypad (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 536AA2CC113; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:24:27 +1300 (NZDT)\r
+From: micah anderson <micah@riseup.net>\r
+To: sebastian@sspaeth.de, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+In-Reply-To: <960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de>\r
+References: <87my083mgh.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d4148s2c.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>\r
+       <4B595D3A.1030901@SSpaeth.de> <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
+       <960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de>\r
+Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:24:15 +1300\r
+Message-ID: <87wrz4fqsw.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at mx1\r
+X-Virus-Status: Clean\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Git feature branch\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:00:03 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:46:43 -0800, sebastian@sspaeth.de wrote:\r
+> > I think it would make sense to move the mainline to git.debian.org\r
+> > for now, or another place where everyone can easily get an account.\r
+> > As alternatives I propose repo.or.cz. I'd prefer to stay away from\r
+> > commercial services like Github.\r
+\r
+I too prefer to stay away from commercial,non-free services like GitHub.\r
+Gitorious (http://www.gitorious.org/) is a great service, similar to\r
+Github, but with added freedom.\r
+\r
+Currently the git repository is at git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch\r
+which seems like a fine location for it, but perhaps I missed the\r
+motivation for switching to a centralized repository with the added\r
+overhead of giving people access to commit?\r
+\r
+Couldn't all of this be done without moving the existing git repository\r
+(don't forget that transition is a cost)? Those who wish to put together\r
+these proposed branches go ahead and do so, publishing those wherever\r
+they like (git.debian.org, gitorious, their own hosted git repositories,\r
+or even github) and then Carl can just add those as remotes as he sees\r
+fit.\r
+\r
+> > What patch tracking workflow should we adopt? Keep sending patches\r
+> > to the mailing list and have a few people who integrate them into\r
+> > master or pu (or even maint/next), as appropriate? Use the Debian\r
+> > bug tracker? Use Sebastian's Roundup instance? Set up a patch queue\r
+> > manager on notmuchmail.org? Use patchwork [1]?\r
+\r
+Personally, I've found mailing lists that have patches sent to them\r
+tends to totally kill the list for anything else. It seems a bit weird\r
+to use Debian's bug tracker for a non-Debian native program (but using\r
+it for the Debian package of notmuch does make sense). I am not so\r
+familiar with Roundup, patch queue trackers or patchwork to have\r
+anything to say about those.\r
+\r
+micah\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLX2uQAAoJEIy/mjIoYaeQu50P/22TEB8ovPSvCQSEllIUxHFA\r
+uMYz0Pwd0Il8xtKhxo7exHhhcoYyCgFmIp/m/PUChgAtRAQ0kzWyiLXcO8mlge6n\r
+MrhKhaOnyVo8Jsos0Lm0VSRC6IDlge1H47dcvRj86lBaRdThagnxjGLy0iOBqGbf\r
+4QgiRjoijzMsXUMSAV0byD/XW7lS4wW3vu9pLx/IVkNWM0sCS6/xE35D8F1WInr0\r
+Ol5Io6pV3GsBuxERJoSujgJ3H8+6OjX4I0TB2lRNaPuRCuKK2/Vr3RzP8upwxoes\r
+NB7FqtXNk/owN/RaTFUYCV3Jk+Lrgp3ny8sVbXDBoviWIDHpThg5wnVN91BMIJRX\r
+HnDR2ib4fakCAtxI60G6wwJVtRbCLd0gI/yoC7nhog9Y82jAqBye8eeO63mvPQeJ\r
+SplClJXh57H1GXJqtz2Nvtv5nAQFcdIvb+hTDSoyMeRMa0Mv57bRW6S3Gwmmrygx\r
+SWFGdb1pFugXWspuJd/Q1JKba49545Sg3Wsofz9gL6xNZ99Tf6G76sTKAKRF/F4D\r
+XCy1ESUGTyBTkSrRxHAKlD0d3vOy6r26T+4LITkTBOGuZnGq3CzP9ynt3xMW+0H3\r
+HNyIQqKGWbCxwwNq5D7zR3lEf+aCGulVhuRgyZxlBgr15hoY14onMlO8uBqfLSSo\r
+qlYxj4c2W81ZPu1iXMYE\r
+=x9yZ\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r