Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address scanning functions

diff --git a/2d/2b87172df6c28d8f473849dc477f80a719889e b/2d/2b87172df6c28d8f473849dc477f80a719889e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1afc28d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2d/2b87172df6c28d8f473849dc477f80a719889e
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E367D431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:41:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id hFA9A7dySNoZ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:41:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620B8431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:41:03 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by wibhr12 with SMTP id hr12so2721167wib.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:41:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.24.105 with SMTP id t9mr22166082wif.19.1326739262218;\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:41:02 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net\r
+       (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eu3sm35566448wib.6.2012.01.16.10.41.00\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:41:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)\r
+       id 23F04A0397; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:40:59 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,\r
+       David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address\r
+       scanning functions\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vl78qug.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+References: <cover.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <f994789d065d898911bbf127a7453137a9ba8e27.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet> <878vl78qug.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+64~g42e8f66 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:40:58 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <cun7h0rsd6t.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:41:04 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:15 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmai=\r
+l.com> wrote:\r
+> Hello.\r
+>=20\r
+> Since this patches got in, I have yet to send a single email to the\r
+> address(es) I intend to :( I am really used to the bindings and this\r
+> change is a pain.  From IRC discussion, it seems like I am not alone\r
+> here.\r
+>=20\r
+> There was a proposal to change reply bindings to 'ra' and 'rs'.  When\r
+> 'r' is pressed an appropriate help message can be given in the\r
+> minibuffer.  I like this proposal.  What do others think?\r
+>=20\r
+> If others like it, how about reverting to the old bindings until the new\r
+> ones are implemented?\r
+\r
+I'm inclined to push on for a while and see if it sticks. Previous\r
+experience with this kind of change suggests that it takes a week or so.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk8UbzoACgkQaezQq/BJZRaAwgCeNNh+dNAGirwBAqQaToxYMoMX\r
+N4gAnRuHhWC0dsypE7zY+gJ4X0EXolFe\r
+=6NkG\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r