Re: have "notmuch help" call man?

diff --git a/ab/e5e63ccd36284a45fae201a6f260fecc9cf34b b/ab/e5e63ccd36284a45fae201a6f260fecc9cf34b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d997c63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ab/e5e63ccd36284a45fae201a6f260fecc9cf34b
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282EB431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:17 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id gm2sEqgyb73T for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79877431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5A43280AF;\r
+       Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
+       [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562BB3280CC;\r
+       Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:11 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 029781405; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: have "notmuch help" call man?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ehvxtgoi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <87zkescxp5.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87iplbyj0w.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <87ehvxtgoi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+93~ga124635 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:08 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87k45pqkaz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:53:17 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:43:09 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> The man pages are now installed, a notmuch help (built from this branch)\r
+> uses them.\r
+\r
+Hey, David this is really great.  Thank you so much for working on this.\r
+This will make things much easier to maintain down the line.\r
+\r
+I think what you've done looks great.  A couple small issues:\r
+\r
+* There are a couple of formatting issues (notmuch.1, notmuch-config.1,\r
+  notmuch-reply.1).\r
+\r
+* The notmuch part command is completely deprecated, so I don't think\r
+  there's really any reason to include a man page for it.\r
+\r
+* There's no man page for restore (notmuch-restore.1).\r
+\r
+It also occurs to me while looking through this: do we really need a\r
+separate "setup" command?  Does that ever really get run?  Doesn't\r
+notmuch new run the setup if it doesn't detect a config?  If there's\r
+really reason to run it again at a later point, why don't we just have a\r
+=2D-setup option to notmuch new instead?  It would also make notmuch.1\r
+cleaner if we removed it.\r
+\r
+> I'm not sure if posting the patches make sense; it's up to 74k of diffs,\r
+> even using "git format-patch -D".  I'm open to suggestions, as always.\r
+\r
+While in general I think it's nice to have patches to the list, but I'm\r
+not sure how much benefit there is in this case.  I would be fine to\r
+just see the patch merged directly from your branch.\r
+\r
+Again, thanks for the work on this, David.  This=20\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO8re0AAoJEO00zqvie6q8f8AP/RZOt/9QeYweAn6hKWAG/zy4\r
+hjHtZ7nkeCO77CquiexUlIv7oLvrSDgVMes1RhiLzaOFDBPo8YosP61/3tEhffb3\r
+mp0GWDdDBGkhZ/6DQMoK+SPNwNkBXkrmao03ZzU1Ah3wi51jVP7HaTrxzzqtzkpB\r
+j6aEqY/Lcgy7W491lz1wYl9tpMxD6fZqyNK0Ph1+6Zfgk2+8hs0rS8Bmj1KVPnu8\r
+vxIG5PQ0fQQoW5BFs/dCe0YcWyCxjfyQ9vfO08b4pLiASZsBiM09P+TZaFF3iLZX\r
+1RMlzsVEVgoNI5E1ZPOeHLbu4HaXlIa+5LEWeYLL3aRGHWBFxa38tjsbETy5NR12\r
+nABZQmLJnYqUGd+wBRxzbJQgoOxxmMd1lqqrSPWfTBD5LyyOLcpqlzdYjx6U1A+3\r
+qFKMAH8yFWD/8RYBTh3IVTSPXmDfKefCF+p5eTU/48pIT8P7eX1bk2jR/NO70pPz\r
+4cCvcGLqwZbBLq0pMEK1Uvh+4NAJVnUnPpsVBfmN08fueA7iD8Uqt/zNZI116X6d\r
+YG5RFXOFLyFoGaEU15n7FDXOYK4LhSO/sg3rXCgGTQ1Pz7oN5BxoPIuvPsG5tHkS\r
+Y+nMgOLXSvvX8qCDJSGMmU07rrKwhC6T/OPRr0xSKb3Yu35v5Sor9HamKjM7XZOd\r
+Tlkj1UV/7MTR0lwVd6Uz\r
+=fjJC\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r