Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] emacs: `notmuch-show-buttonize-links' only `notmuch-show's a messa...

diff --git a/30/9054a21a16be08538ddf5648fceb26927d3b4c b/30/9054a21a16be08538ddf5648fceb26927d3b4c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..db08b3e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/30/9054a21a16be08538ddf5648fceb26927d3b4c
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB9A429E54\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:09:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id xGPODyJ8SHPg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:09:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A0C429E40\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:09:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1RovIJ-0002st-SG; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:09:08 +0000\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+       helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1RovIJ-0004g5-Fx; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:09:07 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com>,\r
+       Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>,\r
+       Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] emacs: `notmuch-show-buttonize-links' only\r
+       `notmuch-show's a message if it exists\r
+In-Reply-To: <1327222469-29487-2-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
+References: <871uqsku4h.fsf@praet.org>\r
+       <1327222469-29487-2-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+77~gad6d0d5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:10:02 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87pqecdmd1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 8bf294e79fb1e85b1365ba25cfb5044f (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:09:17 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+> * emacs/notmuch-show.el (notmuch-show-if-found): new function that only shows\r
+>   a message/thread if present in the database and otherwise returns an error.\r
+\r
+I like this in principle but it interacts awkwardly with the automatic tag\r
+exclusion. If the id:<message-id> matches a message with an excluded tag\r
+then notmuch-show-if-found will not let you view it, but if you typed the\r
+same search in a search field it would show you the message. \r
+\r
+Note notmuch show currently does not currently respect excluded tags (see\r
+id:"871uqvgrnm.fsf@qmul.ac.uk"), and this is not completely trivial to\r
+fix since it is not clear quite what its behaviour should be in some\r
+corner cases.\r
+\r
+Perhaps we could have an option like "--include-all" to notmuch\r
+search/count to tell it not to apply the exclusions. On the other hand\r
+that might also be useful as something the user can type in a search box\r
+so a special search term (eg include:all) might be better.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r