Re: Patch review/application process

diff --git a/b2/3042107bd87c726a3b8662d9633741dd219e52 b/b2/3042107bd87c726a3b8662d9633741dd219e52
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5de6255
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b2/3042107bd87c726a3b8662d9633741dd219e52
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B3F431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:16:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id H-4pJ5Pyott3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:16:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA84431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:16:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from zancas.localnet\r
+       (fctnnbsc36w-156034064058.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       [156.34.64.58]) (authenticated bits=0)\r
+       by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9PNGKhP018152\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);\r
+       Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:16:21 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1RIqEF-0007Cx-NH; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:16:19 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Patch review/application process\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid>\r
+References: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:16:19 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <874nyw8xx8.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:16:29 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:42:33 +0200, Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org> wrote:\r
+\r
+>   A mechanism to share notmuch tags between users could probably also be\r
+>   adapted for this purpose, but this would make it harder for\r
+>   non-notmuch users to discuss issues / see existing with the same\r
+>   comfort. (Package maintainers or people who want to check what\r
+>   outstanding flaws exist before migrating to notmuch come to mind).\r
+\r
+FWIW, I'm currently working on such a mechanism, and it should be done\r
+before _too_ long.\r
+\r
+d\r