Re: [PATCH 3/4] emacs: Add pseudo saved search to match mail that no saved search...

diff --git a/33/c7eb044bae8b72bec4c6496e92292d8e527496 b/33/c7eb044bae8b72bec4c6496e92292d8e527496
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6fde6b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/33/c7eb044bae8b72bec4c6496e92292d8e527496
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87FE421192\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id T8JGUGiJyiC2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.216.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5708442118E\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so1004326qwb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.229.6.196 with SMTP id a4mr997053qca.143.1309384040388;\r
+       Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (nikula.org [92.243.24.172])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm1216691qcs.33.2011.06.29.14.47.18\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+ notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] emacs: Add pseudo saved search to match mail that no\r
+       saved search matches\r
+In-Reply-To: <87d3hwxt0x.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <cover.1309244829.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <e599ef4e125ba9410bb7fefe3208a39079ba8383.1309244829.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <87liwkxxfm.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87y60kv1gl.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+       <87d3hwxt0x.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-232-g917e874 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:47:16 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87sjqsnwd7.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:47:21 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:49:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+Non-text part: multipart/signed\r
+> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:15:22 +0000, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> > So to clarify, do you prefer having on/off switches, or just enabling\r
+> > this without customization at all? Personally I'd shy away from the\r
+> > latter, but I guess it depends on how useful vs. distracting people find\r
+> > this.\r
+> \r
+> My opinion is to just make it a feature without any customization at\r
+> all.  I can see no harm in having these searches always available.\r
+\r
+That should clean up the code a bit as well. Then we're left with\r
+picking the sensible names. I just use "other" and "no tags" myself. Do\r
+you see value in e.g. surrounding them in brackets like "[other]" and\r
+"[no tags]" to signify they are special? Better ideas? I'm not a native\r
+speaker...\r
+\r
+And while at it, how about also making append the non-customizable, IMHO\r
+sensible, default for saved searches in patch 2/4?\r
+\r
+\r
+Jani\r