Re: [PATCH 1/2] add notmuch keybinding 'd'

diff --git a/61/ea81d5b9dd563276f25dc3cd4307dacd451616 b/61/ea81d5b9dd563276f25dc3cd4307dacd451616
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..583a461
--- /dev/null
+++ b/61/ea81d5b9dd563276f25dc3cd4307dacd451616
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839D8407492\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2012 12:52:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id SugA+Q6OS00G for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  6 Jan 2012 12:51:59 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802E9407490\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2012 12:51:58 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from [131.202.13.154] (helo=convex-new.cs.unb.ca)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+       (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1RjGlY-0003fJ-No; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:51:57 -0400\r
+Received: from bremner by convex-new.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1RjGlT-0006kF-J7; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:51:51 -0400\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Antoine =?utf-8?Q?Beaupr=C3=A9?= <anarcat@koumbit.org>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] add notmuch keybinding 'd'\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k454wq0e.fsf@marcos.anarcat.ath.cx>\r
+References: <1266408746-28549-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <1310841600-28281-1-git-send-email-anarcat@koumbit.org>\r
+       <cunvcos6dhp.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+       <8762gsy2xp.fsf@nikula.org> <87k454wq0e.fsf@marcos.anarcat.ath.cx>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+114~g80ee511 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:51:51 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87boqg5zbs.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:52:00 -0000\r
+\r
+On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:57 -0500, Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 <anarcat@koumbit.o=\r
+rg> wrote:\r
+> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:57:22 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+\r
+>  * lib: add 'safe' setting for flags\r
+>  * lib: Add back the synchronization of 'T' flag with deleted tag\r
+>  * run notmuch-hello-mode-hook at the end of the hello mode setup\r
+\r
+>=20\r
+> Most of those do not change the current behavior, and I have been\r
+> running them for more than 4 months.\r
+>=20\r
+> I'd very much like to get help to get this in...=20\r
+\r
+Hi Antoine;\r
+\r
+I understand your frustration; it's not very motivating to feel\r
+ignored. Over the last few months we have been working to develop a\r
+patch review process for notmuch [1], but as you can see from [2] there\r
+is still a backlog of patches that have not been reviewed, the two lib\r
+patches you mention among them. More reviewers are always welcome ;).\r
+\r
+David\r
+\r
+[1]: http://notmuchmail.org/nmbug/\r
+[2]: http://nmbug.tethera.net/status/\r