Re: Replacing my name/email with "me" (or similar) in author lists
authorDavid Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:51:49 +0000 (12:51 +2000)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:45:00 +0000 (09:45 -0800)
68/34e764d48bf392d0575eadd2c9ee6ede972d23 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/68/34e764d48bf392d0575eadd2c9ee6ede972d23 b/68/34e764d48bf392d0575eadd2c9ee6ede972d23
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..50f7dcb
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF373431FBD\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:51:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.276\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[URIBL_RHS_DOB=0.276] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id zbAt2Y--F-tR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:51:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB78F431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:51:56 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+       (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1S1hKE-0003Kb-Tx; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:51:55 -0400\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1S1hK9-0000Il-Fw; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:51:49 -0400\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Replacing my name/email with "me" (or similar) in author lists\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ehthfsyn.fsf@schoepe.localhost>\r
+References: <slrnjki3c7.tcm.quite@kelebek.lublin.se>\r
+       <20120226112210.5422.8471@brick.lan>\r
+       <87ehthfsyn.fsf@schoepe.localhost>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+239~g4d2d96b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:51:49 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87fwdxk062.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: /\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:51:57 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:41:04 +0100, Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org> wrote:\r
+> \r
+> At least it should not be done in the library, because it'd need to read\r
+> the user's addresses from configuration file which the library is not\r
+> supposed to access, as far as I understand.\r
+> \r
+\r
+One can work around this by passing in the relevant configuration data,\r
+but then it isn't clear how much of a win it is in code complexity.\r
+\r
+I have sometimes wondered about having another library layer making some\r
+of the current CLI functionality accessible to bindings. I'm not really\r
+sure of the pro's and con's of such approach. It would certainly be\r
+overkill for this one feature.\r
+\r
+d\r