Re: [PATCH] Add 'd'elete keybinding to search and show views

diff --git a/90/d341b3e4f541433c1d3fc4dbd9ac20902ce279 b/90/d341b3e4f541433c1d3fc4dbd9ac20902ce279
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e15d894
--- /dev/null
+++ b/90/d341b3e4f541433c1d3fc4dbd9ac20902ce279
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452464196F2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:37:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.89\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id rm0m+fGv6ly3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:37:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu (tarap.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.7])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C307431FC1\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:37:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (geco.phys.columbia.edu\r
+       [128.59.170.159])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by tarap.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3LNb1cr011858\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:37:05 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1O4jTZ-0002wI-F6; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:37:01 -0400\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,\r
+ Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add 'd'elete keybinding to search and show views\r
+In-Reply-To: <874oj48k20.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+References: <1271891763-10757-1-git-send-email-hohndel@infradead.org>\r
+       <1271891763-10757-2-git-send-email-hohndel@infradead.org>\r
+       <874oj48k20.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:37:00 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87wrw0ml7n.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.7\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:37:08 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:25:43 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> wr=\r
+ote:\r
+> The one thing I would suggest is adding a level of customizability,\r
+> instead of hardcoding in "deleted".\r
+> i.e.:\r
+>=20=20\r
+>   (defvar notmuch-delete-tag "deleted")\r
+>=20\r
+> and then:\r
+>=20\r
+>   (if delete\r
+>       (notmuch-show-add-tag notmuch-delete-tag))\r
+>=20\r
+>=20\r
+> The less we force specific tags on users, it seems to me, the better.\r
+\r
+Hey, Jesse.  There's been some discussion on this, and I think Carl's\r
+position (sorry if I'm putting words in your mouth, Carl) was to just\r
+settle on the tag "deleted" for this concept (of deleted messages) and\r
+stick with it.  I tend to agree with that position.  I think it's better\r
+to just pick a tag for this and stick with it, and "deleted" is as good\r
+as any.  If we allow customization on this level then I think things are\r
+going to get confusing and harder to support down the line.\r
+\r
+Jesse, can you think of a reason why it would really be better to allow\r
+customization for this?\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLz4wcAAoJEO00zqvie6q8A0YQALY6MrnpVK7ANqf4xt0a2EkX\r
+yd0SRilWNr9/r7wlizq6hoz/phTYVG8K8C3Gz0fjbmTAuvWzsRjNsspMINsORjiM\r
+VVuMsWR7SmP3XLNB4xmUc0PQsjAPH4muZBEVeH0mwPeNFEdkXunozKNGeztG8e0l\r
+JHNlZy0sUUW1e8s7td6WkVQfc3j5V/KntHER7oNHe/RlFBY5q6uhD4d1MRETJna8\r
+LvAu/AFiyJ4ARApITIYIkGjWIaN6BITj0aXtP1ZgrZMVldyISY0yJclPsm6isc45\r
+4rn7Oj0fIzkjVb70xdBOUId7xpr2mr1+Nezv4pngNfahwtsWf6e6oQPvmN1jzwR8\r
+WDMO6QFEg858sZSg6FRcfZVMu7CZMINMEX579vTYHmOR+i022wTiIYbG9raI+eUl\r
+K5rMf0WkRmYHn+YyE50AD5u1LhiQCL+o3CwhkfUbg4wYT7VbSLtKSfrhMPGWrka9\r
+rTWBiCFNIxwK5XDcXhiKkJ85l3ojhTFYHXu06n2Cr0u0HPYSHjPoA+TBGBotH3Wz\r
+ikahBG135NzpFCILieACTfWJc14omujtK70sLizVk4kPoi05Go1fxyr7o+mguCT1\r
+2/dzTh6WNAgiyfWlEQOfgEvLqScXtSr9bzq2mAop9YXuap3WrT6wqTSuew//pER9\r
+NTOyMgGiiI6nvP/eHs4K\r
+=NaeN\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r