+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE99A6DE610B\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.579\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.141,\r
+ DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,\r
+ RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id csHk9eXfkuVU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 14 Aug 2016 07:25:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.50]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 843226DE76FF for\r
+ <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 06:36:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id q128so51554107wma.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 06:36:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=nikula-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;\r
+ h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
+ :mime-version; bh=Ru8pXx1QDo5bSGsapD4PDhjrN0I90TIG5O3qgHucg/Y=;\r
+ b=HHoK4DIXh/nyFxN2lV0icTilX2Hxps1QOtw7/LilpGRA3ifrLPcWhefgjSSc/MHUye\r
+ m+jODUXtY9fXP6RsagR8WuZtoZj6GOtzKHGuilNgQg2G0BNwPBy3svPxVvZ8WPMUbY9k\r
+ HT1AP/Y2P9PyTY6S+pEYM1Rcup2E2oyCOwFYLedx1whqM8iJS39rbZPT2WCljHHjFwES\r
+ O3X0M1LyAyN73VvrbryDlNh5QwvUBNkIvOopeV1vEFs+Fo2BaX21u28QlZPUupo11zf4\r
+ 991SdrlziJtwL7kzCff9yQj1mKlURaPlpgJaaOOMSUlZEjVQ/sYEBmtT+bGWfBAMGSG/\r
+ eraw==\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+ :message-id:mime-version;\r
+ bh=Ru8pXx1QDo5bSGsapD4PDhjrN0I90TIG5O3qgHucg/Y=;\r
+ b=IYwiMeUvYP4cuu+Fhd7LmMGVR+r0lWU8/R5cmQZHIrKvk5fapQyq/XSR9mhXOTTSKU\r
+ mu195JEk1c9kD9953gKVerlah7yPOM9Sx5bQ2dgwvX4fggTmz3sJMHd9kA87WOKKnLBX\r
+ 6Lm/ooDjlSrw+tiSd3UDuZNmYBFa0B+PEndBbUPwE96hLaGJ3NvHMm6PUkNrworA9oAf\r
+ wEipfVM+ufz3J8mUTEAucqeqRp1MeyJZod1na7GrebaIEhNK/C19LXxmj6WTHXGfMe0g\r
+ CeW20E/0lLVKzdXKtgkPEJ1QSLLHjj3VBiXEBv8XnlO2fAH/gPl7uHpTcjgTDfmgNOUF\r
+ flaw==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ AEkoousWDEHqZYwUPsBY1XWEKgIvnHvUoRLELIPOoZTalULEldSSvUDh/7/PBdZiwQ1r0A==\r
+X-Received: by 10.194.29.2 with SMTP id f2mr24579056wjh.161.1471181799706;\r
+ Sun, 14 Aug 2016 06:36:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (mobile-access-bcee63-250.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+ [188.238.99.250])\r
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pm1sm16692784wjb.40.2016.08.14.06.36.38\r
+ (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Sun, 14 Aug 2016 06:36:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow specifying alternate names for addresses in\r
+ other_email\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <87oa4vtta4.fsf@shlevy-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
+References: <1470776118-5070-1-git-send-email-shea@shealevy.com>\r
+ <87k2fk98yh.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+ <87oa4vtta4.fsf@shlevy-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
+Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:35:13 +0300\r
+Message-ID: <874m6no4mm.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 14:26:09 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com> wrote:\r
+> Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:\r
+>\r
+>> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com> wrote:\r
+>>> Currently, while notmuch-reply will recognize email addresses other than\r
+>>> the main address with user.other_email, it always sets the name part of\r
+>>> the address in the envelope-from and From headers to user.name. This\r
+>>> patchset enables specifying names on a per-address basis with a new\r
+>>> user.other_name property. Presumably other users of user.other_email\r
+>>> may want to use this as well, but those are not updated currently.\r
+>>\r
+>> I am not convinved by adding another configuration option, especially\r
+>> when it has to be in sync with another configuration option (ordering in\r
+>> user.other_name having to match user.other_email). I would much prefer\r
+>> allowing (but not requiring) "Name <user@example.org>" style addresses\r
+>> both in user.primary_email and user.other_email.\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> This would be fine with me. Is there already code in place to separate\r
+> out the name and email values from that kind of email address?\r
+\r
+I think we should use gmime for this, and expect the configuration to be\r
+a comma separated list of addresses, specifically in the format that\r
+internet_address_list_parse_string() parses [2]. On the plus side, it'll\r
+handle most of the weird corner cases about (lists of) email addresses,\r
+and we can probably safely ignore the ones it doesn't handle. We already\r
+use that stuff in notmuch-show.c and notmuch-reply.c. On the minus side,\r
+using the functions is about as much fun as string manipulation\r
+generally is in C.\r
+\r
+Then there's the annoying detail that this'll change the format of the\r
+config from a semicolon separated list to a comma separated list. This\r
+means switching from using g_key_file_get_string_list() to\r
+g_key_file_get_string(). But we also need to have backward compatibility\r
+somehow. One option is to add a new config option (didn't I just frown\r
+on adding new ones?) that would replace all of user.name,\r
+user.primary_email, and user.other_email, making the first in the list\r
+the primary one. So we could check if, say, user.email is present, and\r
+use that for all of the name/primary/other configuration, falling back\r
+to the separate fields otherwise. This is also a safe option in case\r
+some other software uses the configuration options directly.\r
+\r
+Anyway, this will be slightly tedious to code, and some of the changes\r
+might be a bit controversial, so I suggest waiting until we get feedback\r
+from others first. (David, I'm looking at you!)\r
+\r
+>> With a cursory glance at the implementation, I wonder if you could just\r
+>> pick the name based on the address you've picked earlier, and leave the\r
+>> address matching mostly as it is. Would save some passing of parameters\r
+>> around. Maybe.\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> Hmm, I'm not sure what you mean by this, sorry. Can you expand?\r
+\r
+Only match the *address* part, and when you've found a match, find the\r
+corresponding name part. Or do you need to be able to distinguish\r
+between different names with the same address?\r
+\r
+No matter what, I think the first thing should be changing just the\r
+config, and then building the rest on top afterwards.\r
+\r
+>> Additionally, I'd very much like to have my series [1] merged\r
+>> first. It'll be *much* easier to rebase your series on top than the\r
+>> other way around...\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> Happy to rebase my work on yours.\r
+\r
+Of course, lacking review, there's no guarantee my series actually gets\r
+merged. It's open source, first come, first served!\r
+\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r
+\r
+\r
+>>\r
+>> [1] id:cover.1471088022.git.jani@nikula.org\r
+\r
+[2] https://developer.gnome.org/gmime/stable/InternetAddressList.html\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff