--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <darren@fernseed.info>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch+junk@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch+junk@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AD54196F0\r
+ for <notmuch+junk@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:04:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: YES\r
+X-Spam-Score: 6.159\r
+X-Spam-Level: ******\r
+X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
+ DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA=2.157, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.31,\r
+ RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+ autolearn=no\r
+X-Spam-Report: * 2.2 FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA HOST dns says "in-addr.arpa"\r
+ * 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,\r
+ * https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/\r
+ * [217.169.4.204 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]\r
+ * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%\r
+ * [score: 0.5000]\r
+ * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from\r
+ author's * domain\r
+ * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily\r
+ * valid\r
+ * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature\r
+ * 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with\r
+ * dynamic-looking rDNS\r
+ * 0.0 T_MIME_NO_TEXT No text body parts\r
+ * 1.0 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id g7Bmk0qZRx6u for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:04:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 441 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;\r
+ Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:04:57 PDT\r
+Received: from silentio.fernseed.info (204.4.169.217.in-addr.arpa\r
+ [217.169.4.204])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1265C431FC1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:04:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from bookbinder.fernseed.info\r
+ (b.8.3.8.7.3.e.f.f.f.c.2.4.2.2.0.1.0.0.0.4.9.f.f.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa\r
+ [IPv6:2001:8b0:ff94:1:224:2cff:fe37:838b])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: darren)\r
+ by silentio.fernseed.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B96320E\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:57:35 +0100 (BST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fernseed.info;\r
+ s=default; t=1272221855;\r
+ bh=B3wh2xRUSDvQIfTHlwfn3zwyvBoblkjrUU2atja3Ygo=;\r
+ h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type;\r
+ b=BybxmrcB3cNrg2XsxuOW0EYlvRRsV0QNI9m9224ENR5h/USierw4IR4t+5PR7jvFS\r
+ loyS53/QNq68eLiIRY0GJfyVjbk2ddv0ndEhigRW93qWlWHOedvFK7J1WY/ClIfzzx\r
+ Q7N7ldy2mAHTFFSMJGxemb94m28pQBS1JIswc1XY=\r
+From: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Kudos! Also: +1 PGP!\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-187-g7c5f017 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1\r
+ (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:57:33 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87r5m3gy1u.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:04:58 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+I just wanted to drop a quick mail to the list to give you all my huge\r
+thanks for this already astonishingly useful tool!=20=20\r
+\r
+Like a few others, it seems, I arrived here after reading a\r
+not-very-grumpy review in the Grumpy Editor series[1].\r
+Everything-is-a-search combined with CLI access?! Sold!\r
+\r
+I've been slowly moving all my day-to-day mailing needs to notmuch over\r
+the last month and the only thing I'm missing is native message\r
+decryption and verification support - is this being actively worked on,\r
+I haven't seen it mentioned in a while? Or is it feasible to add this\r
+as a target for an upcoming merge window? How far away are we from\r
+something workable - are we just(!) looking for someone to stitch the\r
+code together or do we need to brainstorm a little more exactly what the\r
+approach is likely to be?\r
+\r
+In the meantime, I find myself using the snippet from Tassilo in:\r
+\r
+ id:87zl6cl595.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de\r
+\r
+Which lets me jump to the selected encrypted message in Gnus and have it\r
+in turn auto-decrypt the text. Works well but does need a second mail\r
+program ;-)\r
+\r
+\r
+[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/380073/\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEUEARECAAYFAkvUkJ0ACgkQP1ao/7snsT5e4gCgsuw6Q59gnIo9VnZ+Cbo9/02r\r
+V9kAmLwF+N1Ldm5sPj4saqL6VJ99sbE=\r
+=JoGz\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r