Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] notmuch list: A new command to produce various lists.

diff --git a/94/29effc6510dfc1f4ee075456992c140d26efc5 b/94/29effc6510dfc1f4ee075456992c140d26efc5
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d900358
--- /dev/null
+++ b/94/29effc6510dfc1f4ee075456992c140d26efc5
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B169431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id YNRRDCdv2vgs for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
+       [209.85.218.224])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92578431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so3165734bwz.30\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:50 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:cc:subject\r
+       :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=sNal901Lxj4qtdZsRwQjXCPl8C6xVDNSylsJy5mMDNg=;\r
+       b=lw7hYyzG9MQ7528W8RA6YynIrNW7+hxymy03nRv1ZBFe570oFl95l9i86DrxgmNOSf\r
+       HP5AYRAwg6SOGjoaXP46Bzk/xWz/JByGgw00qCZLb0w9Ncx8JJq5nmnnq+1cg8sA5qxc\r
+       ENhTYrpbnuBl1rsgHmq/jsae076THbJFQIqKg=\r
+DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type;\r
+       b=rjfj/VQhPFNv8/p9Pmwzg/7G1cErrVx4NLgcerItpmWFlNnFP96NzhS75OBSqwRRxq\r
+       MEqaUbGMLYkF6P6Tgaf32igUVzESRdcyJBUc8/h3F31GwCV6V0I/rnjOoskTdhVZKbET\r
+       Kmg8wIZDbtJOxKpFBTtmGylq7Yrt9Rwg2EQo8=\r
+Received: by 10.204.32.76 with SMTP id b12mr2830467bkd.165.1258845650764;\r
+       Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:50 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 18sm3492222fks.34.2009.11.21.15.20.49\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
+       Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:49 -0800 (PST)\r
+Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
+From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
+To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com>\r
+In-Reply-To: <87my2f329e.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <1258630481-5133-1-git-send-email-jan@ryngle.com>\r
+       <1258630481-5133-2-git-send-email-jan@ryngle.com>\r
+       <f35dbb950911190352q2dcd041fr83a2f722f3231f44@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87lji2bmrb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <f35dbb950911211307t1cd8e039xca754828c75b26f6@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87my2f329e.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:21:19 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <876393tqfk.fsf@59A2.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] notmuch list: A new command to produce\r
+ various lists.\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:20:52 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:07:57 +0100, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+> One thing we'll still have to think about is how to remove the "virtual\r
+> tags" from the completion list, (once we have virtual tags in the\r
+> configuration file---that is, tags applied automatically based on search\r
+> specifications).\r
+\r
+Do these need to be real tags?  Would it be sufficient for them to just\r
+be aliases for search patterns?  I think I would prefer the latter\r
+because I could modify the pattern and not have to rewrite tags to the\r
+whole database.  Maybe real tags are needed to optimize expensive\r
+patterns, but I wouldn't think the user needs to know about that.\r
+\r
+Jed\r