Re: notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57

diff --git a/02/9512ed545dfd0b91d63059f61e5be57c59f7e4 b/02/9512ed545dfd0b91d63059f61e5be57c59f7e4
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..69854fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/02/9512ed545dfd0b91d63059f61e5be57c59f7e4
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+Return-Path: <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D389431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 11:47:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.789\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id iwhstJ-wRek4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  6 Jul 2011 11:46:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FE8F431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 11:46:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so318545bwg.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:46:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
+       :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=T33Bx9ECyom4ItbI/JaVR7YUEzVTX/okBveotCDjBSY=;\r
+       b=lHJUvB3w7riQiOhTTw8i+b0FTCd7D00Sjd++4ye44xT9QVnU+fxFWHbzwBNSfflcQ0\r
+       0GJSyW8mB15OlLXBOMVoSm1jGcU716ZHKfwQWoQVVQucEg0xg0k9CYvutvKmQfrjeITj\r
+       5wL6KbHGnS9fJsikTYn1/isV0GWKEZhGiEGzU=\r
+Received: by 10.204.10.75 with SMTP id o11mr5436440bko.124.1309978017759;\r
+       Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:46:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (dslb-088-069-135-087.pools.arcor-ip.net\r
+       [88.69.135.87])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o27sm2207494fag.0.2011.07.06.11.46.55\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:46:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Daniel Schoepe <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>\r
+To: Sander Boer <sanderboer@mauc.nl>, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@sspaeth.de>\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CACEMMeewjcM1Vo=uq_wrhe_5Z+OESsJD_29-D7z5JxT6Mvq7qA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <mailman.5.1309146869.12973.notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+       <cuozkl367o2.fsf@mauc.nl> <87wrg5905c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87wrg3pyra.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <CACEMMeewjcM1Vo=uq_wrhe_5Z+OESsJD_29-D7z5JxT6Mvq7qA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-321-g7d7ebd8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:46:48 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87fwmjqmav.fsf@tredergarh.home.box>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:47:00 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 20:31:03 +0200, Sander Boer <sanderboer@mauc.nl> wrote:\r
+> If IMAP supports tags, is that not a big deal ?\r
+> I mean, having a converging point for all tags, is that not like the holy\r
+> grail in this field ?\r
+\r
+One problem is that maildir doesn't support tags, so we would have to\r
+switch to a format that does or somehow store them in the maildir, in\r
+which case we would also have to adapt offlineimap or a similar tool to\r
+sync tags as well.\r
+\r
+> Do you know what the status is of *server* support ? Because imo this *is* a\r
+> big deal, without real standardized server support an IMAP store for tags is\r
+> off the table.\r
+\r
+Support for tags is mentioned in the RFC for IMAP, but it's optional. As\r
+far as I know, must servers today support them though.\r
+\r
+Cheers, Daniel\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOFK2ZAAoJEIaTAtce+Z+J4eQP+gPwo/1CBYzvhDyCMJOGayN7\r
+Ew/s8u6owOlh2l+UMuzlCMNrWmZZ0+3wkGzBf5T7PyvQyoETpc6Ee6/dta9F4nCO\r
+hG6POW+ZWC+hG7t3BWmQ2T6NX6Y011FfToHyQH3ps2OYby2Gg60UqpAwtmA8QskE\r
+xNMc86Gd3S8YMiOa7QZjOXGUl1VlDVOyaMo/YKXNbah7G3dAen2200DbUB9+ekFg\r
+vzqTkh7JVKS5H7k3k2tjYbrGNOwsUSPCRJ77OfTyyxw9d423f/vVJSVTzTjAq+zh\r
+n/KQ+2uTh9GBtnaHBX2RSqDUISj0eLgqUXiFITItpIVSGs5DHXmMbvFVOgvCXLYS\r
+mmX8tyB68+QHBTzJExOZS6HoLK0poh2AdXYUVz8UANQgr7etSSpkU2/5iqxHKHum\r
+OeXaJKChgB+mO5BTtC6EIgq7Wk7fneKJu/TyCN0WtWWyIRh8aaMHK8T3HeIxQd2h\r
+cbE2Vf5A1vSqvdr5jrGzAlNykuy5Spq69wt8kjk2O0Ag0jI/whtvoreg+SBph/3F\r
+M96TLMCFO9LG/865pWH72q8JKYZXJ+l7WAWbur+3kHTYnmWSSTD2f31rGeGpziCG\r
+D0eNCo6jahDx/xLgMcX+COX0xVi22sEjOGOHrV+kFxbAulM6P5UoMAAd/ANuKYeR\r
+T2hNmVbz1TrY7g1SHkru\r
+=fNZB\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r