Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap
authorJani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:29:10 +0000 (13:29 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:51:06 +0000 (09:51 -0800)
df/ef01310f8603fb25c20af3f82ae149b682e260 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/df/ef01310f8603fb25c20af3f82ae149b682e260 b/df/ef01310f8603fb25c20af3f82ae149b682e260
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..afe9b13
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA120431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.699\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id BL+--t8SEjLT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2AC431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oi10so1307158obb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
+       :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=/2/FnH4eE+71wfLTbIyFh4EFDbTzAm7EpB20GDoUde8=;\r
+       b=XTS1HuMhDJ7zd6hNCLzRf/udmwy6DZE0mqxLOlu+Ar+mZqEU4OmD1esWhc2Q1mSo12\r
+       Ifhf1NDwH2hvuR9SsrruChaBKIDyxIJv88jODPq9oYP00JJ1lxy3FvmEy357h3xaOZcn\r
+       skJZ/FOB0UJ3bgPlp2y09DcHo4R6Ktd8qhOff0fXQx/QXkhhqHHIffZf8jTIuSgajFNT\r
+       T6+1uo70jLF5t/pGKkUJ1F5SS71zbz91S4FPR2Pf8QAQ7jxJE4x37tJRbcRbtbyskwx1\r
+       jC8y2sUbkHVJQUeVMdEcxL7E/IpHsOc8oxEayhiqqDVb4/DP6ha4/Qfsh41T8toxncBN\r
+       Xujw==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.182.95.133 with SMTP id dk5mr2852403obb.14.1354102150634; Wed,\r
+       28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.76.69.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.76.69.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAMP44s26iY8eKDLCeLe-jO9Y+AY-+NnS+UZeUMQnLxNniL9xqg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <k8vn08$62g$2@ger.gmane.org> <87zk24ctko.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <50B3871B.2050509@gmail.com> <87r4ngcl00.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <50B48627.9040409@gmail.com> <xa1tfw3vugkf.fsf@mina86.com>\r
+       <CAGhLh6Fhxq=bFHVPfVaMg0dXLgF3VEr-nBh62CbBAW7arwsM9Q@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <xa1t8v9mvogd.fsf@mina86.com>\r
+       <CAGhLh6HKLwFbyfp8AfYLJuhhCxQUCpZ4F8nfJ6q1WmBZVOZSuQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <xa1t38zuvmqb.fsf@mina86.com> <50B5BDFF.1080802@gmail.com>\r
+       <CAMP44s26iY8eKDLCeLe-jO9Y+AY-+NnS+UZeUMQnLxNniL9xqg@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:29:10 +0200\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAB+hUn8XcHRVAhFLmqxUEDh7hvXX898Rm0-bjRXNkfce=ZHOZw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQklvfDDxB+JlbXp72sjzVzQl6HP1Z2WjqpK6VK3qH8AMAaOHH8JRBRAz+CY8OgjSJhszYYW\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>, Rainer@krugs.de\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:29:12 -0000\r
+\r
+--14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
+wrote:\r
+>\r
+> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>\r
+> >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is\r
+terrible idea, since this\r
+> >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.\r
+> >\r
+> > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding\r
+gmail / other server\r
+> > communication is not the best idea.\r
+>\r
+> And I disagree.\r
+\r
+Which part do you disagree with, before or after "and", or both? Care to\r
+elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions?\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r
+\r
+--14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988\r
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+<p><br>\r
+On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, &quot;Felipe Contreras&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:felipe.contreras@gmail.com">felipe.contreras@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>\r
+&gt;<br>\r
+&gt; On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug &lt;<a href="mailto:r.m.krug@gmail.com">r.m.krug@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>\r
+&gt;<br>\r
+&gt; &gt;&gt; I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible idea, since this<br>\r
+&gt; &gt;&gt; would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.<br>\r
+&gt; &gt;<br>\r
+&gt; &gt; My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding gmail / other server<br>\r
+&gt; &gt; communication is not the best idea.<br>\r
+&gt;<br>\r
+&gt; And I disagree.</p>\r
+<p>Which part do you disagree with, before or after &quot;and&quot;, or both? Care to elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions?</p>\r
+<p>BR,<br>\r
+Jani.<br>\r
+</p>\r
+\r
+--14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988--\r