Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

diff --git a/78/d27e52697f8c2e5bc72596b2d4cc269fe0a491 b/78/d27e52697f8c2e5bc72596b2d4cc269fe0a491
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2fa3ee2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/78/d27e52697f8c2e5bc72596b2d4cc269fe0a491
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+Return-Path: <darren@fernseed.info>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5E1429E42\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2012 14:37:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.11\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id bpPIojILKowc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  3 Jan 2012 14:37:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from silentio.fernseed.info (silentio.fernseed.info\r
+ [81.187.184.164])     (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No\r
+ client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 8BADD431FD0   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2012 14:37:04 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (bookbinder.fernseed.info\r
+       [IPv6:2001:8b0:ff94:1:224:2cff:fe37:838b])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: darren)\r
+       by silentio.fernseed.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF57C342;\r
+       Tue,  3 Jan 2012 22:37:01 +0000 (GMT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fernseed.info;\r
+       s=default; t=1325630222;\r
+       bh=ZiIEZp0LqbIy92dU4YzTqllE5MQWGtb3A7zSPD/m6yw=;\r
+       h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:\r
+       MIME-Version:Content-Type;\r
+       b=ZeWtTlUbh2+/wlNcIgRIzK7QHjv2OGuCDMD6tnGf6EfkYxl53vvvCxuRj8pcd30zP\r
+       2fGAzcGCRDW9cC85sVJQe8t9KbgmY0RRiOrSfg5mbrbuxOrKnTTwpykPxaZ4Khcn/H\r
+       3JZT2T1WfjK0roDrymH903EqoeifEC4Mc1uXKVVM=\r
+From: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>\r
+To: Peter Portante <peter.a.portante@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16\r
+In-Reply-To: <4F037CA3.5020501@gmail.com>\r
+References: <4F037CA3.5020501@gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11~rc2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i386-redhat-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87vcosmn04.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:37:05 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante <peter.a.portante@gmail.=\r
+com> wrote:\r
+> I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been=20\r
+> able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under=20\r
+> Fedora 16.\r
+\r
+Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)\r
+\r
+And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread\r
+F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API\r
+differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't\r
+part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.\r
+\r
+What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is\r
+2.6 officially out there and stable?\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk8DgwwACgkQP1ao/7snsT5d6QCfbNYjK6+QltXJbvG4ek/jwIoP\r
+I6wAn1cEHxJk2Vep6yDNr4MEAv8qYzRi\r
+=7TPJ\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r