Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs

diff --git a/02/47441de1b7de92449280d49f57d4d1d5c29ce3 b/02/47441de1b7de92449280d49f57d4d1d5c29ce3
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8786e18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/02/47441de1b7de92449280d49f57d4d1d5c29ce3
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6E9431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  9 Jan 2012 23:47:32 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 32aXQZ07uqFT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  9 Jan 2012 23:47:31 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 8D5E9431FB6   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  9 Jan 2012 23:47:31 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2239245wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:47:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.77.228 with SMTP id v4mr32810977wiw.8.1326181650422;\r
+       Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:47:30 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net\r
+       (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm82201820wbh.22.2012.01.09.23.47.28\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:47:29 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)\r
+       id 3FD2FA07BB; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:27 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs\r
+In-Reply-To: <1325975294-646-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+References: <1325975294-646-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+151~gbf1dc2b (http://notmuchmail.org)\r
+       Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:23 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <cunwr90ngms.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:32 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+\r
+On Sat,  7 Jan 2012 14:28:10 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> I try to address the concerns that have come up in previous attempts.\r
+> In particular, I include a patch that creates a new customization\r
+> variable, notmuch-search-exclude-deleted, that will exclude any\r
+> messages with the "deleted" tag from searches.  This actually makes\r
+> "deleted" messages appear effectively deleted, which is one of the\r
+> things cworth wanted to see, and one of the reasons he kept pushing\r
+> back on previous attempts at this functionality.\r
+\r
+I honestly don't understand the reason for this. If someone wants to not\r
+see messages that they have tagged as 'deleted', they add 'and not\r
+tag:deleted' to the end of the search expression.\r
+\r
+The messages aren't actually deleted because they have the 'deleted'\r
+tag, so why would they not be shown?\r
+\r
+If it's really intended that those messages not be shown then perhaps\r
+the tag should be called 'not-shown' or something.\r
+\r
+> Also, no tags other than "deleted" are modified.  All tags should be\r
+> orthogonal, and should be handled so.\r
+\r
++1\r
+\r
+The name 'deleted' for the tag should be a configuration option, as a\r
+non-English speaker (for example) might want to use something else.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk8L7QsACgkQaezQq/BJZRbVDwCfcyI4vGmH5rP1yCB+qYZrULPG\r
+aXoAn3MaGKDMBwo0ppY9Zd7P4cAhF9V/\r
+=eWxQ\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r