Re: [PATCH 0/6] Rebase of Pieter's "set test prereqs"

diff --git a/33/be901b321e0a1b634f7bfa3c4c992afa59dc17 b/33/be901b321e0a1b634f7bfa3c4c992afa59dc17
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4d05ea5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/33/be901b321e0a1b634f7bfa3c4c992afa59dc17
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6237429E26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:47 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id LBRlh+mdOBNp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:47 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 303C9431FB6   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:47 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so1946254wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.181.11.163 with SMTP id ej3mr7782597wid.4.1326388125929;\r
+       Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([109.131.126.209])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v28sm6434502wbo.18.2012.01.12.09.08.45\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>\r
+To: Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Rebase of Pieter's "set test prereqs"\r
+In-Reply-To: <87aa7vawek.fsf@thor.loria.fr>\r
+References: <1320176954-4897-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
+       <1321454035-22023-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net>\r
+       <8739dneqra.fsf@praet.org> <87aa7vawek.fsf@thor.loria.fr>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+115~gadd29f6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:07:06 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87lipcluit.fsf@praet.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:08:48 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:14:11 +0100, Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net> wrote:\r
+> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:50:17 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:\r
+> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:33:49 +0100, Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net> wrote:\r
+> > > Hello list,\r
+> > > \r
+> > > This is another rebased version of Pieter's series to add GPG and Emacs as test\r
+> > > prereqs, plus some additions on my own. (Rebased and posted as requested by\r
+> > > Pieter [1].)\r
+> > > \r
+> > \r
+> > Thanks Thomas!\r
+> > \r
+> > Although... you may have misread (or maybe I mistyped :), but what I\r
+> > actually intended [1] was for you to rebase *only* your fixes on top of\r
+> > my rebased series (e.g. see "tjost-fixes.patch" in att), so you could\r
+> > receive proper credit for cleaning up my mess.\r
+> \r
+> Oh, ok, I must have misread that :) \r
+> \r
+> Right now your patches don't apply cleanly on master (conflict in patch\r
+> 3 due to commit 5964a7), and I think that Dmitry's patches [1] may be a\r
+> better way to handle prereqs. So I probably won't send those patches\r
+> until we decide which approach is the way to go.\r
+> \r
+> [1] id:"1321494986-18998-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com"\r
+> \r
+\r
+Yup, Dmitry's solution is much more elegant!\r
+\r
+> > Also, while my apprehension [2,3] re the inclusion of the SCREEN/DTACH\r
+> > prereq in patches #4,5,6 didn't have much merit (it's an all-or-nothing\r
+> > affair anyways), the issue [3] in patch #5 @ "Reply within emacs" still\r
+> > stands: `sed' will run unconditionally, and treat "EMACS" as an input\r
+> > file.  (see "sed-prereq-fix.patch" in att).\r
+> \r
+> Nice catch with this sed issue. Looks like I need to be more careful\r
+> when replacing "OUTPUT" with "EMACS OUTPUT"...\r
+> \r
+> Thanks,\r
+> \r
+> -- \r
+> Thomas/Schnouki\r
+\r
+\r
+Peace\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Pieter\r