--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0105F431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:18:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id wT0TYxKJWfAR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:18:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2BF431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:18:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1SNROl-0006IK-SP; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:18:35 +0100\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+ helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1SNROl-0001h5-JH; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:18:27 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: jake <jake@mgap.ru>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Possible bug with notmuch search & --limit --offset\r
+In-Reply-To: <000301cd23c5$174d6510$45e82f30$@mgap.ru>\r
+References: <000301cd23c5$174d6510$45e82f30$@mgap.ru>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+128~g0f26d91 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:18:45 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87lili31qy.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: b87c1eebc0c24f0ca7dc1ff1f54c37a1 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+ Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+ * medium trust\r
+ * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+ * domain\r
+ * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:18:41 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, jake <jake@mgap.ru> wrote:\r
+> Hello, \r
+>\r
+> I'm finding that when I use the --limit option with the output=files and\r
+> offset=N that the returned list of files is of variable length.\r
+>\r
+> For instance when:\r
+>\r
+> notmuch search --output=files --offset=6 --limit=2 steve\r
+>\r
+> it returns\r
+>\r
+> /var/spool/mail/virtual/archive/sl/.Sent/cur/1335243985.M765351P23366V000000\r
+> 0000000801I0000000000820E9C_5.archive,S=275069:2,S\r
+> /var/spool/mail/virtual/archive/sl/.Sent/cur/1335243986.M749883P23366V000000\r
+> 0000000801I0000000000820E9D_6.archive,S=275069:2,S\r
+> /var/spool/mail/virtual/archive/sl/.Sent/cur/1335243987.M926961P23366V000000\r
+> 0000000801I0000000000820EA0_9.archive,S=111888:2,S\r
+> /var/spool/mail/virtual/archive/sl/.Sent/cur/1335243988.M718230P23366V000000\r
+> 0000000801I0000000000820EA1_10.archive,S=111888:2,S\r
+\r
+Hi \r
+\r
+You might have duplicate copies of the messages: that is different files\r
+with the same message. (I think the search returns all the filenames\r
+but am not sure.) Notmuch uses the messageid so you would just need to\r
+check if some of these files have the same message-id header.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+>\r
+> Which is two more results than required. If I choose different offset values\r
+> then the number of returned results will vary too. \r
+>\r
+> If I issue:\r
+>\r
+> notmuch search --offset=6 --limit=2 steve\r
+>\r
+> It returns two results as expected, if I change the output type to anything\r
+> other than files (summary/threads/messages/tags) then the correctly limited\r
+> list is returned. So it only seems to happen with the files output type.\r
+> Both json and text format types exhibit the same behaviour.\r
+>\r
+> Am I using this correctly ? I expect only two results to be returned but\r
+> being new to notmuch gives me doubts that what I am doing may be incorrect.\r
+>\r
+> My apologies if the mailing list is not the place for this sort of report,\r
+> please direct me to a more appropriate place.\r
+>\r
+> Many Thanks\r
+> Jake\r
+>\r
+>\r
+>\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff