Re: [PATCH] test: overhaul multipart test to test for improved message/rfc822 handling

diff --git a/61/70e55cee9ebb979b929763e689cf75dd885335 b/61/70e55cee9ebb979b929763e689cf75dd885335
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d15794a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/61/70e55cee9ebb979b929763e689cf75dd885335
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA8E431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Sep 2011 19:08:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Tt6ctdf6KoHF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  5 Sep 2011 19:08:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E09431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Sep 2011 19:08:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from zancas.localnet\r
+       (fctnnbsc36w-156034073093.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       [156.34.73.93]) (authenticated bits=0)\r
+       by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8628ImD024749\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);\r
+       Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:08:19 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1R0l5G-0000zI-5N; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:08:18 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: overhaul multipart test to test for improved\r
+       message/rfc822 handling\r
+In-Reply-To: <1315249306-22328-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+References: <1307320169-29905-4-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1315249306-22328-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:08:17 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87wrdmv2we.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 02:08:34 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon,  5 Sep 2011 12:01:46 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> The main goal of this overhaul is to define how message/rfc822 parts\r
+> should be handled.  message/rfc822 parts should be output in a similar\r
+> fashion to the outer message, including some subset of the rfc822\r
+> headers.  The following decisions about formatting of message/rfc822\r
+> parts were made:\r
+\r
+I have pushed the remaining 3 patches in the series. Namely this one,\r
+and the last 2 from the previous series. I added a brief note to the\r
+commit message about the one test which fails.  I think on the whole the\r
+approach Jamie took of writing the test as the specification is the\r
+correct one. \r
+\r
+d\r