Re: [PATCH] emacs: Quote MML tags in replies

diff --git a/99/102775e5dd7820000ea7e18fadeb4057f2ca12 b/99/102775e5dd7820000ea7e18fadeb4057f2ca12
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..32efafb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/99/102775e5dd7820000ea7e18fadeb4057f2ca12
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280AF431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:23:01 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id dcGpQLqrt3-M for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:23:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.41])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 90518431FAE   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:23:00 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so91468wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:22:59 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.103.2 with SMTP id fs2mr47583485wib.21.1327015379363;\r
+       Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:22:59 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([109.131.97.13])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dm10sm2881003wib.4.2012.01.19.15.22.58\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:22:59 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>\r
+To: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Quote MML tags in replies\r
+In-Reply-To: <m2vco72tf3.fsf@wal122.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu>\r
+References: <1326998589-37187-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com>\r
+       <20120119224842.GS16740@mit.edu>\r
+       <m2vco72tf3.fsf@wal122.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+99~gab86e73 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:21:08 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87obtzuvmj.fsf@praet.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:23:01 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:56:16 -0500, Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:48:42 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wr=\r
+ote:\r
+> > Did you consider using point-max instead of mark?  IIRC, that mark was\r
+> > very recently introduced which, perhaps irrationally, makes it seem\r
+> > less future-proof to me.\r
+>=20\r
+> Well, if the patch goes in and someone changes the code so that it no\r
+> longer sets the mark (in the same way), they will be the one breaking\r
+> stuff, and they=E2=80=99ll have to come up with the fix themself.  [...]\r
+\r
+True that.\r
+\r
+\r
+> [...] Using point-max\r
+> would include the signature in the quoting as well.  It would probably be\r
+> fairly odd to want to put an MML tag in one=E2=80=99s signature, but that=\r
+ doesn=E2=80=99t\r
+> mean that we should break that usage.\r
+>=20\r
+\r
+So, would I be right to assume MML tags in signatures are never\r
+evaluated to begin with?  Otherwise, there would still be a security\r
+hole, no?\r
+\r
+\r
+> >=20\r
+> > >=20=20\r
+> > >  (defun notmuch-mua-forward-message ()\r
+> > >    (message-forward)\r
+> >=20\r
+> > Speaking of future-proofing, it would be good to have a test.\r
+>=20\r
+> It would.  ;)  I=E2=80=99ll work on one.\r
+>=20\r
+\r
+Thanks!\r
+\r
+These might save you some time:\r
+  id:"1310313335-4159-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"\r
+\r
+\r
+> --=20\r
+> Aaron Ecay\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
+\r
+\r
+Peace\r
+\r
+--=20\r
+Pieter\r