Re: bug in emacs-ui ?
authorSebastien Binet <seb.binet@gmail.com>
Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:59:37 +0000 (14:59 +0200)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:38:39 +0000 (09:38 -0800)
b2/d0d9d898d399bcd218ab4bb13539bfc742f4f1 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/b2/d0d9d898d399bcd218ab4bb13539bfc742f4f1 b/b2/d0d9d898d399bcd218ab4bb13539bfc742f4f1
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..dcd9d40
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+Return-Path: <seb.binet@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73792431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Cc"\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.789\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id fLVad+f5ejty for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com\r
+       [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6772431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so3276532wyb.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
+       :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=OG/szENbxkD02TrHdPF09Uhlz2X1kUXr8qSJTSXnbIw=;\r
+       b=EGGicd52uUGKPJH8OuEbuj0GTZkl94UPgOoVn+B9qaBefs1cV1h8b9PYhQ3GtyXe9g\r
+       zMEyMXXwt3v8VMtAMVq3RfcYFgU2NNJXIPWqS2Pq70syapI6Lt4GNA1m7OlnS35EcZVF\r
+       EghyJkI4He/DgQukF2wDtT6nIdiiniSL4E6to=\r
+DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
+       :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
+       b=XgD5wXx9+Gbb60BGhWkPy0Eeruwa6NyxvLN0gpUmFnXHkyz/I7xUCUCXQI4aIupTfR\r
+       xOs6bT7WgLhKfQhCN2cbBSWsmwWROvjLYnLfV8aXeY3S7Vwf/u9R/y/ExyspnCSB6IJ2\r
+       2XOJW7S9v17b6kzB4jthDAQ8+80DEi5C2N1GM=\r
+Received: by 10.227.24.72 with SMTP id u8mr6154336wbb.94.1308661272131;\r
+       Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (pc-88068.lal.in2p3.fr [134.158.88.68])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o19sm3989713wbh.21.2011.06.21.06.01.10\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Sebastien Binet <seb.binet@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Subject: Re: bug in emacs-ui ?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87hb7jg2rl.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <8739j5rn2d.fsf@cern.ch>\r
+       <87pqm8cz4f.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87oc1spkkc.fsf@cern.ch>\r
+       <87mxhccw9v.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87hb7kpi7e.fsf@cern.ch>\r
+       <87fwn4cm9q.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <BANLkTin=viaP4US-=qj2x7BQOKhGaLeaHw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87hb7jg2rl.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-238-gc39b492 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:59:37 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87vcvzs5l2.fsf@cern.ch>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: , notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:01:14 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:41:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=\r
+ucture.net> wrote:\r
+Non-text part: multipart/signed\r
+> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:01:17 +0200, Sebastien Binet <seb.binet@gmail.com>=\r
+ wrote:\r
+> > and I checked there were no lingering .el files...\r
+> >=20\r
+> > so...\r
+> >  any way to tell which notmuch-emacs-ui I am actually using ? (I am a n=\r
+ewbie\r
+> > when comes to hacking lisp)\r
+>=20\r
+> Hey, Sebastien.  You can determine the loaded version of a library from\r
+> within emacs with the follow command:\r
+>=20\r
+> M-x locate-library notmuch\r
+which points to the system-wide one.\r
+\r
+>=20\r
+> It's also good to know how many notmuch instances are installed on your\r
+> system.  For instance, I have a system-wide installation, a "personal"\r
+> installation, the build currently in the source tree, etc.  Depending on\r
+> the options I supply to emacs at startup, I could run a variety of\r
+> versions.\r
+being root and having this great ArchLinux package manager system at my\r
+finger tips, I only have one installation of notmuch :)\r
+\r
+playing a bit more, I cloned your 0.6 branch, cloned the official one,\r
+slammed the 0.6/emacs directory on top of the official one, built the\r
+official one, installed it and everything worked.\r
+\r
+I am trying to see which changeset is the source of my problem...\r
+\r
+=2Ds\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk4AlbkACgkQPj4AVbsZCCb3DwCgu7+GCzvsiYVWbDwMw0K1FyDq\r
+YegAoJHX5nqem9A9pB+CiRpK3+PiGd22\r
+=yuqX\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r