Re: Patch review/application process

diff --git a/b7/baab3d5d36ec1908ed06a77edb1cd010a9c3e2 b/b7/baab3d5d36ec1908ed06a77edb1cd010a9c3e2
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4d989a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b7/baab3d5d36ec1908ed06a77edb1cd010a9c3e2
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7EE431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  1 Nov 2011 07:29:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id RkbCsvzq7UCm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  1 Nov 2011 07:29:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9576C431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  1 Nov 2011 07:29:00 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from zancas.localnet\r
+       (fctnnbsc36w-156034064058.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       [156.34.64.58]) (authenticated bits=0)\r
+       by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA1ESuRJ013269\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);\r
+       Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:28:59 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1RLFKi-0006BC-0k; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:28:56 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Patch review/application process\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid>\r
+References: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+26~g4e49596 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:28:45 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87hb2n7w82.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:29:02 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:42:33 +0200, Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org> wro=\r
+te:\r
+\r
+>. There is also a number of patches that have been reviewed by\r
+> long-term contributors, but are then seemingly forgotten (I can find\r
+> some concrete examples of this, if this claim is in doubt).\r
+\r
+<pet-project-promotion>\r
+Maybe you can tag those patches as "notmuch::reviewed" using nmbug? [1]\r
+My idea is that=20\r
+\r
+   notmuch search tag:notmuch::patch and tag:notmuch::reviewed\r
+\r
+should give a kind of consensus set of "ready to go" patch sets. Don't\r
+worry about if I or someone else disagrees with your assessment, we can\r
+always untag it, and leave a comment in the commit log. [2]=20=20\r
+\r
+</pet-project-promotion>\r
+\r
+There are also plenty of patches that are not reviewed at all. I'm not\r
+defending the state of patch integration, but I think we could use some\r
+more reviews as well.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r
+[1]: http://notmuchmail.org/nmbug/\r
+[2]: nmbug log $id could be defined as something like "cd $HOME/.nmbug && g=\r
+it log -- tags/$(echo $id | sha1sum -)"\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iJwEAQECAAYFAk6wAh0ACgkQTiiN/0Um85lvywP+IP1DRhhIz7DOaiX1E21kJrx/\r
+11R3oHGqZwOx5uHYFHSIXILlNUycRdDl/lJwKoC6R1KtFF7SklXYPd4MIXVySA22\r
+V5f/LjIuaEa1JnzDKQExhhDbbrtj2FpM6H5cZw8YRrOsQYQt/2dA5xcFsJdIUyj0\r
+RDnfJdYGzy028T4AMcw=\r
+=W1yo\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r