Re: notmuch search and tags

diff --git a/fb/73b097db7c15f1e73c00379b886bb6065850a9 b/fb/73b097db7c15f1e73c00379b886bb6065850a9
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a35b570
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fb/73b097db7c15f1e73c00379b886bb6065850a9
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Return-Path: <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAAE431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 08:26:14 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id SwIjx-sWfssO for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  5 Nov 2012 08:26:13 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from e28smtp05.in.ibm.com (e28smtp05.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.5])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9214B431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 08:26:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from /spool/local\r
+       by e28smtp05.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use\r
+       Only! Violators will be prosecuted\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org> from <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;\r
+       Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:56:07 +0530\r
+Received: from d28relay04.in.ibm.com (9.184.220.61)\r
+       by e28smtp05.in.ibm.com (192.168.1.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway:\r
+       Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; \r
+       Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:56:05 +0530\r
+Received: from d28av04.in.ibm.com (d28av04.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.66])\r
+       by d28relay04.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id\r
+       qA5GQ1hK8454572\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:56:04 +0530\r
+Received: from d28av04.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by d28av04.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id\r
+       qA5Ltqp2015749\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:55:52 +1100\r
+Received: from skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com ([9.77.193.48])\r
+       by d28av04.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id\r
+       qA5LtpuQ015666; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:55:51 +1100\r
+From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,\r
+ notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch search and tags\r
+In-Reply-To: <87wqy0fniq.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <874nl4fq7h.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87wqy0fniq.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+76~g84a0c52 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.50.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:55:59 +0530\r
+Message-ID: <87mwywnhig.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+x-cbid: 12110516-8256-0000-0000-000004E248F1\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:26:14 -0000\r
+\r
+Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:\r
+\r
+> Hi\r
+>\r
+> Do you have some customisation of the notmuch search line\r
+> (notmuch-search-result-format) in your .emacs file?\r
+>\r
+> Previously the user specified format for tags was ignored (and\r
+> automatically enclosed the tags in brackets). Over the summer Austin\r
+> fixed this and many other bugs (with the move to json for the search results).\r
+>\r
+> If you do have a customised search line then just replacing the ("tags"\r
+> . "%s) by ("tag" . "(%s)") should fix it.\r
+>\r
+\r
+That was it. Updating notmch-search-result-format fixed it.\r
+\r
+Thanks for the help\r
+-aneesh\r
+\r