Re: release-candidate/0.6

diff --git a/c7/f23f42166a32597b97f78fd84858930af7b77d b/c7/f23f42166a32597b97f78fd84858930af7b77d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..87d460f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c7/f23f42166a32597b97f78fd84858930af7b77d
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+Return-Path: <darren@fernseed.info>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A41429E20\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  7 May 2011 04:53:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 3.206\r
+X-Spam-Level: ***\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA=2.933, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id nh3vIYqH6HoZ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat,  7 May 2011 04:53:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from silentio.fernseed.info (202.4.169.217.in-addr.arpa\r
+       [217.169.4.202])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33D8431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  7 May 2011 04:53:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (bookbinder.fernseed.info\r
+       [IPv6:2001:8b0:ff94:1:224:2cff:fe37:838b])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: darren)\r
+       by silentio.fernseed.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D372DA0A;\r
+       Sat,  7 May 2011 12:53:30 +0100 (BST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fernseed.info;\r
+       s=default; t=1304769211;\r
+       bh=02GmSRxk7IwAaYuY3wsFU0geeuhF/w2NcdzhY0mQW4g=;\r
+       h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:\r
+       MIME-Version:Content-Type;\r
+       b=aw1ted+K6wKE3s1Qu/tIyzyKQvlAUWEEKoLmL66F585eTd2yVEhBkpyf9oTycmxnc\r
+       fDBGO6yIijEcJo/VnAlh+qGDz3XAiDkq+/JGXpiJw2TwOLMFz7bMepWwm8c+JLyg9L\r
+       l1DevghV3IKok4hvb/yh05PLjytErznqUo87M7TI=\r
+From: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: release-candidate/0.6\r
+In-Reply-To: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 12:53:28 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87mxiyafrb.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 11:53:34 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Fri, 06 May 2011 12:46:34 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> However, the current version of libgmime-2.4 in testing and unstable\r
+> (2.4.23-1) unfortunately breaks signature verification, which means\r
+> that many of the crypto tests will fail.  The issue has been fixed\r
+> upstream, and we've been pushing on the libgmime maintainer to push a\r
+> new release.  Hopefully a release of notmuch 0.6 into debian will put\r
+> extra pressure on getting this issue resolved.\r
+\r
+Another +1.  RC continues to work well (I've been running the crypto\r
+branch since its creation), and I'm now using it with gmime-2.4.24.  No\r
+issues with signature verification that I can see, including viewing\r
+threads previously borked under gmime-2.4.14.\r
+\r
+Thanks for this!\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk3FMrkACgkQP1ao/7snsT6jAQCgi7+VLzvcpOh45aJUbXPsdFWX\r
+IvEAoJBpgXISEKCYUJRuZm7vdvKTKkLU\r
+=W6U5\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r