--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E05431FD0\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:29:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id UBewZPwFdXlj for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:29:12 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com\r
+ [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client\r
+ certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ E8B57429E41 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:29:11 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so19585040eek.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.14.126.80 with SMTP id a56mr22285191eei.121.1325615350459;\r
+ Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:29:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe5cdc00-23.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+ [80.220.92.23])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b49sm177768025eec.9.2012.01.03.10.29.07\r
+ (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:29:08 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: [PATCH] emacs: call "notmuch tag" only once when archiving a thread\r
+Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:29:06 +0200\r
+Message-Id: <1325615346-8302-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:29:13 -0000\r
+\r
+Optimize thread archiving by combining all the -inbox tagging operations to\r
+a single "notmuch tag" call. Also skip redisplay of tag changes in current\r
+buffer, as it is immediately killed by the archiving functions.\r
+\r
+For threads in the order of tens or a hundred inbox tagged messages, this\r
+gives a noticeable speedup.\r
+\r
+On the downside, IIRC Xapian does not perform very well if the query (in\r
+this case a lot of message-ids OR'd together) is very big. It is unknown to\r
+me at which point this approach would become slower than the original one\r
+by one tagging approach, if ever.\r
+\r
+Also, this introduces a limitation to the number of messages that can be\r
+archived at the same time (through ARG_MAX limiting the command line). At\r
+least on Linux this seems more like a theoretical limitation than a real\r
+one.\r
+\r
+Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+\r
+---\r
+\r
+On my Linux machines, 'getconf ARG_MAX' gives 2097152, leading me to\r
+believe that notmuch-show would choke on the thread that would be limited\r
+by this anyway...\r
+---\r
+ emacs/notmuch-show.el | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---\r
+ 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)\r
+\r
+diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el\r
+index 5502efd..b9ea839 100644\r
+--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el\r
++++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el\r
+@@ -1414,11 +1414,28 @@ argument, hide all of the messages."\r
+ (interactive)\r
+ (backward-button 1))\r
+ \r
++(defun notmuch-show-thread-remove-tag (&rest toremove)\r
++ "Remove TOREMOVE tags from the current set of messages.\r
++\r
++Note: This function does not call `notmuch-show-set-tags' on the\r
++messages to redisplay the changed tags. This is meant to be\r
++called by `notmuch-show-archive-thread-internal' which kills the\r
++buffer afterwards."\r
++ (goto-char (point-min))\r
++ (let ((message-ids))\r
++ (loop do\r
++ (let* ((current-tags (notmuch-show-get-tags))\r
++ (new-tags (notmuch-show-del-tags-worker current-tags toremove)))\r
++ (unless (equal current-tags new-tags)\r
++ (add-to-list 'message-ids (notmuch-show-get-message-id))))\r
++ until (not (notmuch-show-goto-message-next)))\r
++ (when message-ids\r
++ (apply 'notmuch-tag (mapconcat 'identity message-ids " OR ")\r
++ (mapcar (lambda (s) (concat "-" s)) toremove)))))\r
++\r
+ (defun notmuch-show-archive-thread-internal (show-next)\r
+ ;; Remove the tag from the current set of messages.\r
+- (goto-char (point-min))\r
+- (loop do (notmuch-show-remove-tag "inbox")\r
+- until (not (notmuch-show-goto-message-next)))\r
++ (notmuch-show-thread-remove-tag "inbox")\r
+ ;; Move to the next item in the search results, if any.\r
+ (let ((parent-buffer notmuch-show-parent-buffer))\r
+ (notmuch-kill-this-buffer)\r
+-- \r
+1.7.5.4\r
+\r