Re: [PATCH 1/7] cli: add --do-not-exclude option to count and search.

diff --git a/3d/6bb0a96ad992c4106b6bb1e84e977ae39092dc b/3d/6bb0a96ad992c4106b6bb1e84e977ae39092dc
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b10e607
--- /dev/null
+++ b/3d/6bb0a96ad992c4106b6bb1e84e977ae39092dc
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FA6421192\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id xiHpcG7MOBrI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:37 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95F3429E25\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:37 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D6B2E50DE0;\r
+       Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:32 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (DHCP-123-180.caltech.edu [131.215.123.180])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC8C2E50DD9;\r
+       Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 105115CC; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,\r
+       Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] cli: add --do-not-exclude option to count and search.\r
+In-Reply-To: <871uqgdrsf.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <8762fu4aqt.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <1327862394-14334-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+       <20120131041732.GY17991@mit.edu> <871uqgdrsf.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+128~g6f388fa (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:21 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <8739av3kbq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:31:38 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:40:00 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> The reason I went for verbose do-not-exclude was to try and avoid the\r
+> double negative ambiguity: does no-exclude mean do-not-exclude or\r
+> do-note-return-excluded-messages. Possibly I am worrying needlessly, and\r
+> obviously I am quite happy to change.\r
+\r
+I also think "no-exclude" or "no-excludes" would be more appropriate.\r
+It's not a command that people will likely use that frequently, so as\r
+long as it's well documented it will be fine.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPKBdZAAoJEO00zqvie6q8m+EP/1EHuy+7gMb6WxPck4EXrlY6\r
+pqpmXUHUzhwU3UDBfAH6VZ3L/dnZdpDwr2/Wjqety7F1PNts1XLXTzAy4Qiu9UEh\r
+XpG2NLAy5KVAC0QYqMgcH3A6hE5jqPwoCpBSrzpU0p7kUg3CjotpePS1FgJO8tOx\r
+SR49L25pCNK9edIZKjycO74E0ax3JkeAUyUIhra07gqVSG0VL5y+9Wg/RIU1q+7h\r
+C7q0soA6cPeaQxjrjcTDaAoGHzWDv403QbOUwrzh6JCPkCVstizvBJ8PAu+SNXGS\r
+cTkVGwd6c/82xDcvop3rRqqHsfh2eDY8LB8qhmWyHNkgY5Ug52D0j2EjPtKv1HD+\r
+8X/w/GTCDpAjj1m5PNTs/OBgJKawQDfrx+ha/AtcusnuyHlpCWUhWQ747YfE/Ntl\r
+f0gOJbnkFUfrqsYG99OktfxWoNIQRFOCQe4qM5FxEjfhrfsb0JgVrQGfQR9kgF+I\r
+ciXqW3IF8ZkgQkWr3G/ABMWuZKW/a6aUSeisaoYFqNON854D1553qv0ipAa0qWtY\r
+8t9XBFd6O8MtuP7Sgp+kijgGMjC8lkYd64j3NIxbnedMny6k4CIYkXTk7wttE+ZV\r
+tB6GgS+qCkTfKzF/8NkrcdEAmqO3jqz886MBoyD5rFxfUK4vBHrphh9zvZE3ubDS\r
+bhTw9MKNRXz4ZFMW5nm2\r
+=xK6B\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r