Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)

diff --git a/73/3e7e4db4dfbe65ccacf444ee973a1361582964 b/73/3e7e4db4dfbe65ccacf444ee973a1361582964
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2fed5fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/73/3e7e4db4dfbe65ccacf444ee973a1361582964
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0461D4196F3\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:02:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.9\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id XmIvHRd0r3AB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:02:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C864196F2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:02:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])\r
+       by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0710D19F3391;\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:23 +0200 (CEST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])\r
+       by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,\r
+       port 10044)\r
+       with ESMTP id 7qz0J3gWrDRm; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:21 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])\r
+       by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C571C19F339C;\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:20 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from wsheee.localdomain (unknown [213.29.198.144])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)\r
+       by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A036FA003;\r
+       Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:20 +0200 (CEST)\r
+Received: from wsh by wsheee.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)\r
+       id 1O0Wa4-0001cX-Ew; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:20 +0200\r
+From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+To: Carl =?utf-8?B?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Dirk\r
+       Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,\r
+       notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.2 release (this week)\r
+In-Reply-To: <871veof1lq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+References: <8739z6rjxf.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <8739z56yb5.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <87d3y9t6xg.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+       <m339z4h7k6.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>\r
+       <871veof1lq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:02:19 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <877hofznms.fsf@wsheee.localdomain>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:02:25 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Carl n=E2=88=85tmuch =E4=9A=B3 Worth wrote:\r
+> > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpae=\r
+th.de> wrote:\r
+> > > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:\r
+> > > Perhaps Carl should get more N=C3=B8rw=C3=A9g=C2=A1a=C3=B1 friends, :=\r
+-).\r
+> >=20\r
+> > Or G=C3=B6rm=C3=A4n or =E4=B8=AD=E6=96=87\r
+>=20\r
+> Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes\r
+> through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII in the From line being\r
+> replied to?=20\r
+\r
+Yes and also in Subject line. You can test this with\r
+id:87r5o1etjb.fsf@steelpick.localdomain.\r
+\r
+Michal\r