Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

diff --git a/bc/58f4a8176151fad7b59f3de164a9b28793f0eb b/bc/58f4a8176151fad7b59f3de164a9b28793f0eb
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..bc6938b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bc/58f4a8176151fad7b59f3de164a9b28793f0eb
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECD4429E25\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:31:47 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id jsKtXYbG0c7T for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:31:47 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB326431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:31:46 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q0CCS8ip016215;\r
+       Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:31:40 +0200\r
+Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
+       by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs104r8-1\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:31:40 +0200\r
+Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
+       by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id\r
+       q0CCVdiK011995; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:31:39 +0200\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>,\r
+       Peter Portante <peter.a.portante@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16\r
+In-Reply-To: <87vcosmn04.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+References: <4F037CA3.5020501@gmail.com>\r
+       <87vcosmn04.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+176~g3f9d738 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:31:39 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <yf6sjjlf6fo.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110,\r
+ 1.0.211,      0.0.0000        definitions=2012-01-12_05:2012-01-12, 2012-01-12,\r
+       1970-01-01 signatures=0\r
+X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0\r
+       ipscore=0 suspectscore=4\r
+       phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0\r
+       reason=mlx\r
+       scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201120075\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:31:47 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +0000, Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info> wrote:\r
+> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante <peter.a.portante@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been \r
+> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under \r
+> > Fedora 16.\r
+> \r
+> Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)\r
+> \r
+> And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread\r
+> F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API\r
+> differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't\r
+> part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.\r
+> \r
+> What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is\r
+> 2.6 officially out there and stable?\r
+\r
+Some conditional compilation by #if(def)ing some *GMIME* macro...\r
+\r
+While doing something else I passed by these messages:\r
+\r
+http://www.mail-archive.com/notmuch@notmuchmail.org/msg05829.html\r
+http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=269819\r
+\r
+These seems to provide valuable information to anyone attempting\r
+to compile notmuch with gmime 2.5+\r
+\r
+Tomi\r