Re: [PATCH 2/3] test: Add `test_emacs_expect_t'.

diff --git a/bc/69f5f0d1b1893edeec45818f14d595c9105b28 b/bc/69f5f0d1b1893edeec45818f14d595c9105b28
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a398021
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bc/69f5f0d1b1893edeec45818f14d595c9105b28
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4112D41EB91\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:47:42 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id IjEf3XbJYa9P for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:47:41 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B132E41ED8E\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:47:39 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by wibhi8 with SMTP id hi8so540457wib.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:47:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.86.105 with SMTP id o9mr5966375wiz.4.1327319258264;\r
+       Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:47:38 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net\r
+       (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm5991764wiw.0.2012.01.23.03.47.36\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:47:37 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)\r
+       id 1ECB3A0950; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:47:35 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] test: Add `test_emacs_expect_t'.\r
+In-Reply-To: <1326977643-19792-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+References: <yf639bcarcs.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>\r
+       <1326977643-19792-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <1326977643-19792-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+100~g9ee96e5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:47:31 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <cun39b64p4c.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQm8cfWePhTuMtJljSwy6qZ6xvShlzQwB7aHi6oDb7KKKF3F1rAkT4ULhCPKKGPWFpbfjrCw\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:47:42 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:54:02 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs\r
+> functionality.\r
+>=20\r
+> `test_emacs_expect_t' takes one argument - a list expression to\r
+> evaluate. The test passes if the expression returns `t', otherwise it\r
+> fails and the output is reported to the tester.\r
+\r
+I've dealt with all of the comments for this patchset that I received\r
+with one exception (declaring test 3 as failing in patch 3).\r
+\r
+Any other comments before I submit another version?\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk8dSNMACgkQaezQq/BJZRZx3ACdGCGI/bYWU0+Hdxen2sPa8GHV\r
+eLUAnRj9WEg7ospvTKirNH2R84hiVGDg\r
+=1bhe\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r