Re: [PATCH] Add missing call to g_type_init()

diff --git a/02/5964a94cfe632e41bab2bdd3f9f7b5f290943f b/02/5964a94cfe632e41bab2bdd3f9f7b5f290943f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..21198d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/02/5964a94cfe632e41bab2bdd3f9f7b5f290943f
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EFE431FD0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:53:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id bq2KqvzlJxd0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:53:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9E0431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:53:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED78B328F09;\r
+       Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:53:15 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-79.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.114.79])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D0D328EFE;\r
+       Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:53:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 0624F2AFC; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:53:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing call to g_type_init()\r
+In-Reply-To: <1311625989-97755-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com>\r
+References: <87ipqsfcpn.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+       <1311625989-97755-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-353-gb44d56e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:53:10 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87bowiccax.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:53:17 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:33:09 -0400, Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> Signed-off-by: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>\r
+\r
+Hey, Aaron.  Thanks for submitting this patch.  However, you will need\r
+to provide a more detailed log message in order for it to be pulled by\r
+Carl.  The commit message should explain what exactly the problem is,\r
+and how this fixes it.  You also don't need to add the "Signed-off-by"\r
+for your own patches.\r
+\r
+I also forgot to mention that if there is a way to test against the\r
+issue that is raised here, then you should probably provide a patch to\r
+the test suite as well.  Some bugs are just bugs, though, and there's\r
+not really a reasonable way to test for them.  That may be the case\r
+here.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOLde2AAoJEO00zqvie6q8OSsQAJVnHV3i/7eRFXzGgdfHGn1h\r
+2G+JiUa8lHK/xyuv79AA086ODLxSdziEjQkD1lo9r+wsuP2b9BwNtK5S7FmnBIpn\r
+WvVJTxvtYLbEGUOFsXx2DrTz1qjqQ/zbnXYFOl7Ku0SdXvI8pcsJrL+vTkkW3iR6\r
+4DenIoQKM4zafBCShf0l6ylp13i05k7lWJD5MNtctB0vmMlvBFAPrLn6ha0aFYjv\r
+xOmebI3OHiSiMQqM4342Czv2a6h7o+9L7aVaLJiaiZ/3tgcIFMZRhLRyKh4bxtKr\r
+MXrFTN4RLC7BU0E2xNPXdRECVzCFxiyb2XeDnH0m5O9PykVaSjWl5walJ2p5sRYo\r
+WEoONlffwAxXO3xtrQaeFb5xRKRbu8Bo23llAQx/pkWIhGikW4b4eW7d559qylGs\r
+MRPddgbEVhA5YDTIcoxS59CF9eFGQZwo3hjpXntjxCg8mkpDo7pwt6Z9KumOma5n\r
+FyrfiKtPPrcrM5VUxRP/ZXz6H+0PtiAioqNG0LsLbdtO+xpcGV4kJHQ/Pwemd60i\r
+UPIjeEvpy3FvXYU9fIiQWVfe8+RBQAYLQ/u1GweR8QM06ySD+xH6xGlAjEhK39TG\r
+YW4/TKhBbs1FLuLe1kdO3dNeiVILsNmmt1HEa5CqjRnHiRm3ReUSJ/yqdEi4775V\r
+oZYvkbnHmUh+GTRowtYD\r
+=cd3L\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r