Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

diff --git a/8d/84303becc5cdc266763803f31fc3b838ac9af0 b/8d/84303becc5cdc266763803f31fc3b838ac9af0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..de8a308
--- /dev/null
+++ b/8d/84303becc5cdc266763803f31fc3b838ac9af0
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+Return-Path: <darren@fernseed.info>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579DB431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 02:41:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 3.206\r
+X-Spam-Level: ***\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA=2.933, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id RnB0hO1ObJ5F for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 27 Feb 2011 02:41:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from silentio.fernseed.info (202.4.169.217.in-addr.arpa\r
+       [217.169.4.202])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBCE431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 02:41:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (bookbinder.fernseed.info\r
+       [IPv6:2001:8b0:ff94:1:224:2cff:fe37:838b])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: darren)\r
+       by silentio.fernseed.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C49EE55;\r
+       Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:41:50 +0000 (GMT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fernseed.info;\r
+       s=default; t=1298803311;\r
+       bh=ivGeCiKN4y0zICVwFjvU/ujCTnY0tj3xrLf9M/k9E1M=;\r
+       h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:\r
+       MIME-Version:Content-Type;\r
+       b=lRC3QR2Q+WfI8QbeaqVlEujfjvliUBYRm5l0708sOIK2wciGPB9YxWoozl7HvHRUe\r
+       9RP5GAZ+UdCo4ZO9+t2Cg8pzRm5xm55Bi2S0AQKyhjmtXMk1ZbMR9RDvzArWfYllCv\r
+       0Z4aMntPQCjCFT0kXhWXDUlRSIzU3yWb/6VAULEo=\r
+From: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>\r
+To: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>,\r
+       Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support\r
+In-Reply-To: <87oc5yi9us.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+       <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87oc5yi9us.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/ (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:41:48 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87d3mdvjwz.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:41:54 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:45:15 -0400, David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca> wrote:\r
+> Further to our discussion on IRC the other day about providing\r
+> feedback on patches, I have run these patches pretty much all of\r
+> February with no glitches.  I am running them on 3 different machines,\r
+> although they are all Debian AMD64 boxes.\r
+\r
+If feedback is needed here then likewise, I've been running the crypto\r
+branch since it was made available.  The only strangeness I've seen was\r
+that which was reported in id:"87sjw2h6xy.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info"\r
+for expired keys.\r
+\r
+Even with that glitch, I really can't see me going back to vanilla\r
+notmuch until these patches are pulled.  They're just ridiculously\r
+useful.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk1qKmwACgkQP1ao/7snsT5HoQCeJbs4zSkCfHt5sfXq8R2Qmoo6\r
+M3sAoJIdkkR+91Mz71SC6EZrGFOH3PMd\r
+=3PXn\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r