Re: attachment with missing Content-Disposition

diff --git a/c3/48deddc6c94d03db2497d95621439f591390f1 b/c3/48deddc6c94d03db2497d95621439f591390f1
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0ed0b25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c3/48deddc6c94d03db2497d95621439f591390f1
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E88431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  8 May 2013 06:36:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.3\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id evG5tIMOuPJP for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  8 May 2013 06:36:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97295431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  8 May 2013 06:36:54 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r48DapRP004483;\r
+       Wed, 8 May 2013 10:36:52 -0300\r
+Received: from remotemail by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.80)\r
+       (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)\r
+       id 1Ua4Y7-0003l9-HG; Wed, 08 May 2013 10:36:51 -0300\r
+Received: (nullmailer pid 1743 invoked by uid 1000);\r
+       Wed, 08 May 2013 13:36:49 -0000\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: attachment with missing Content-Disposition\r
+In-Reply-To: <20130508131538.4060.37894@hoothoot>\r
+References: <20130508131538.4060.37894@hoothoot>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+69~g360c3c8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 10:36:49 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87wqr98ufi.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 13:36:59 -0000\r
+\r
+Johannes Schauer <j.schauer@email.de> writes:\r
+>\r
+> Alternatively, how about making attachment detection configurable so that\r
+> everybody is free to decide himself what he wants to be treated as attachment?\r
+\r
+That was my first thought when I saw the discussion on IRC. It seems to\r
+be a special case of allowing saved searches to be configured at the\r
+library level (it needs to be at least at the CLI level, but then all\r
+the bindings users would have to duplicate this important\r
+functionality).  I don't know how hard this would be to code up, but\r
+there are some things to think about, like how this configuration\r
+information would be stored, and whether it would be part of dump and\r
+restored information.\r
+\r
+d\r