Re: Can't get notmuch to find mail

diff --git a/6c/90f1eb25e7e73e95b4d831ef8ff20847254cc0 b/6c/90f1eb25e7e73e95b4d831ef8ff20847254cc0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..25a9808
--- /dev/null
+++ b/6c/90f1eb25e7e73e95b4d831ef8ff20847254cc0
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+Return-Path: <michael.hudson@canonical.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAA440BC3F\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:34:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.6\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id AD9oxJ3GIFFg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:34:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Greylist: delayed 2827 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;\r
+       Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:34:20 PDT\r
+Received: from adelie.canonical.com (adelie.canonical.com [91.189.90.139])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB5340BC45\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:34:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181])\r
+       by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian))\r
+       id 1OjgYD-0002Ft-LL; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:47:05 +0100\r
+Received: from 158.96.124.202.static.snap.net.nz ([202.124.96.158] helo=grond)\r
+       by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa\r
+       (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <michael.hudson@canonical.com>)\r
+       id 1OjgYC-0006Gb-Tf; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:47:05 +0100\r
+Received: by grond (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id B41A320E9B1; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:46:58 +1200 (NZST)\r
+From: Michael Hudson <michael.hudson@canonical.com>\r
+To: Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>,\r
+       Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+Subject: Re: Can't get notmuch to find mail\r
+In-Reply-To: <20100812212959.GD1531@singpolyma-svelti>\r
+References: <20100805175511.GA1494@singpolyma-svelti>\r
+       <87r5i3gail.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+       <20100812145421.GA1531@singpolyma-svelti>\r
+       <87iq3fg8dt.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+       <20100812153324.GB1531@singpolyma-svelti>\r
+       <4C6464B8.70609@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+       <20100812212959.GD1531@singpolyma-svelti>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:46:57 +1200\r
+Message-ID: <87k4nvphy6.fsf@canonical.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:34:31 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:29:59 -0500, Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net> wrote:\r
+> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\r
+> Hash: SHA256\r
+> \r
+> Somebody claiming to be Michal Sojka wrote:\r
+> > On 08/12/2010 05:33 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:\r
+> > >Somebody claiming to be Michal Sojka wrote:\r
+> > >>Could you run notmuch new through strace and/or apply the patch bellow\r
+> > >>and send the output?\r
+> > >\r
+> > >TRACE file attached\r
+> > \r
+> > Hmm, I see nothing suspicious in the TRACE (besides that it does not\r
+> > index your mails). Are you really using version 0.1 (notmuch\r
+> > --version)?\r
+> \r
+> Hmm...\r
+> My manpage said 0.1 on it, so I didn't question, but my package manager says\r
+> 0.0+201001211401\r
+> \r
+> I guess I should upgrade.  I suppose the only official way to do that (until\r
+> the Ubuntu package updates) is to build from source?\r
+\r
+FWIW, I've got a more recent build in my ppa (add-apt-repository\r
+ppa:mwhudson).  Up to you whether to trust a PPA of course :-)\r
+\r
+Cheers,\r
+mwh\r